HAEM5:B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21: Difference between revisions

From Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[unchecked revision][checked revision]
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21}}
[[HAEM5:Table_of_Contents|Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.)]]
[[HAEM5:Table_of_Contents|Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO Classification, 5th ed.)]]


{{Under Construction}}
<br />


<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=HAEM5 Conversion Notes|This page was converted to the new template on 2023-11-30. The original page can be found at [[HAEM4:B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma with iAMP21]].
}}</blockquote>
==Primary Author(s)*==
==Primary Author(s)*==


Holli M. Drendel, PhD, FACMGG, Carolinas Pathology Group, Charlotte  
Holli M. Drendel, PhD, FACMGG, Carolinas Pathology Group, Charlotte
==WHO Classification of Disease==


__TOC__
{| class="wikitable"
!Structure
!Disease
|-
|Book
|Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.)
|-
|Category
|B-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas
|-
|Family
|Precursor B-cell neoplasms
|-
|Type
|B-lymphoblastic leukaemias/lymphomas
|-
|Subtype(s)
|B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21
|}


==Cancer Category / Type==
==Related Terminology==


B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma
==Cancer Sub-Classification / Subtype==
B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with iAMP21
==Definition / Description of Disease==
Intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21) is a neoplasm of lymphoblasts that are of the B-cell lineage. It is characterized by amplification of the ''RUNX1'' gene at 21q22.3 on a structurally abnormal chromosome 21. Amplification is defined as ≥5 copies of ''RUNX1'' detected by FISH or ≥3 copies of ''RUNX1'' on a single abnormal chromosome 21.<ref name=":0">Borowitz MJ, et al., (2017). B-Lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with recurrent genetic abnormalities, in World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Revised 4th edition. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Arber DA, Hasserjian RP, Le Beau MM, Orazi A, and Siebert R, Editors. IARC Press: Lyon, France.</ref>
==Synonyms / Terminology==
Put your text here <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Include currently used terms and major historical ones, adding “(historical)” after the latter.'') </span>
==Epidemiology / Prevalence==
iAMP21 is observed most often in the older pediatric group (median age of 9 years, with a range of 2-30 years). It accounts for ~2% of B-ALL cases including ~2% of standard-risk and 3% of high-risk patients. The incidence in adult B-ALL has not been established; however, it appears to be less prevalent than in the pediatric population.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Akkari|first=Yassmine M. N.|last2=Bruyere|first2=Helene|last3=Hagelstrom|first3=R. Tanner|last4=Kanagal-Shamanna|first4=Rashmi|last5=Liu|first5=Jie|last6=Luo|first6=Minjie|last7=Mikhail|first7=Fady M.|last8=Pitel|first8=Beth A.|last9=Raca|first9=Gordana|date=05 2020|title=Evidence-based review of genomic aberrations in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Report from the cancer genomics consortium working group for lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32302940|journal=Cancer Genetics|volume=243|pages=52–72|doi=10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.03.001|issn=2210-7762|pmid=32302940}}</ref>
Further, patients carrying a rob(15;21)(q10;q10) have an ~2700-fold increased risk of developing iAMP21 ALL compared to the general population. Additionally, patients with a constitutional ring chromosome 21, r(21), may potentially be predisposed to iAMP21 ALL.<ref name=":1" />
==Clinical Features==
Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instruction: Can include references in the table'') </span>
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Signs and Symptoms'''
|+
|EXAMPLE Asymptomatic (incidental finding on complete blood counts)
|Acceptable
 
|N/A
EXAMPLE B-symptoms (weight loss, fever, night sweats)
 
EXAMPLE Fatigue
 
EXAMPLE Lymphadenopathy (uncommon)
|-
|-
|'''Laboratory Findings'''
|Not Recommended
|EXAMPLE Cytopenias
|N/A
 
EXAMPLE Lymphocytosis (low level)
|}
|}


==Gene Rearrangements==
Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information can be provided in the notes section. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.'')</span>
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
!Driver Gene!!Fusion(s) and Common Partner Genes!!Molecular Pathogenesis!!Typical Chromosomal Alteration(s)
!Prevalence -Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease)
!Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T
!Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source)
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''ABL1''||<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''BCR::ABL1''||<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> The pathogenic derivative is the der(22) resulting in fusion of 5’ BCR and 3’ABL1.||<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (CML)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P, T
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Yes (WHO, NCCN)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference). BCR::ABL1 is generally favorable in CML (add reference).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''CIC''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''CIC::DUX4''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Typically, the last exon of ''CIC'' is fused to ''DUX4''. The fusion breakpoint in ''CIC'' is usually intra-exonic and removes an inhibitory sequence, upregulating ''PEA3'' genes downstream of ''CIC'' including ''ETV1'', ''ETV4'', and ''ETV5''.
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> t(4;19)(q25;q13)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (CIC-rearranged sarcoma)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>


<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Clinical Features|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
''DUX4'' has many homologous genes; an alternate translocation in a minority of cases is t(10;19), but this is usually indistinguishable from t(4;19) by short-read sequencing (add references).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''ALK''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''ELM4::ALK''


Patients tend to present with a low platelet count and low WBC count (<50,000/µl). ~50% of cases are classified as high-risk based on an age of ≥10 years.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Harrison|first=Christine J.|date=2015-02-26|title=Blood Spotlight on iAMP21 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a high-risk pediatric disease|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25608562|journal=Blood|volume=125|issue=9|pages=1383–1386|doi=10.1182/blood-2014-08-569228|issn=1528-0020|pmid=25608562}}</ref>


</blockquote>
Other fusion partners include ''KIF5B, NPM1, STRN, TFG, TPM3, CLTC, KLC1''
==Sites of Involvement==
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Fusions result in constitutive activation of the ''ALK'' tyrosine kinase. The most common ''ALK'' fusion is ''EML4::ALK'', with breakpoints in intron 19 of ''ALK''. At the transcript level, a variable (5’) partner gene is fused to 3’ ''ALK'' at exon 20. Rarely, ''ALK'' fusions contain exon 19 due to breakpoints in intron 18.
 
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> N/A
Bone Marrow and peripheral blood
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Rare (Lung adenocarcinoma)
 
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> T
==Morphologic Features==
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>


There are no unique morphological or cytochemical features that distinguish this entity from other types of ALL.<ref name=":0" />
Both balanced and unbalanced forms are observed by FISH (add references).
 
Cytogenetic morphology of the abnormal chromosome 21 can vary markedly between patients.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Harewood|first=L.|last2=Robinson|first2=H.|last3=Harris|first3=R.|last4=Al-Obaidi|first4=M. Jabbar|last5=Jalali|first5=G. R.|last6=Martineau|first6=M.|last7=Moorman|first7=A. V.|last8=Sumption|first8=N.|last9=Richards|first9=S.|date=2003-03|title=Amplification of AML1 on a duplicated chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study of 20 cases|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12646943|journal=Leukemia|volume=17|issue=3|pages=547–553|doi=10.1038/sj.leu.2402849|issn=0887-6924|pmid=12646943}}</ref>
[[File:IAMP21 met.jpg|thumb|515x515px|iAMP21 in a ring formation; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab|alt=|center]]
<br />
 
==Immunophenotype==
 
No detailed information is known, other than these cases occur exclusively in B-ALL.<ref name=":0" />
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
!Finding!!Marker
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''ABL1''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> N/A
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Intragenic deletion of exons 2–7 in ''EGFR'' removes the ligand-binding domain, resulting in a constitutively active tyrosine kinase with downstream activation of multiple oncogenic pathways.
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> N/A
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Recurrent (IDH-wildtype Glioblastoma)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P, T
|
|
|-
|-
|Positive (universal)||EXAMPLE CD1
|
|-
|
|Positive (subset)||EXAMPLE CD2
|
|-
|
|Negative (universal)||EXAMPLE CD3
|
|-
|
|Negative (subset)||EXAMPLE CD4
|
|
|}
|}


==Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)==
Some rearrangements have been seen as secondary abnormalities.
 
Put your text here and fill in the table


{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
Line 99: Line 110:
!Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Notes
!Notes
|-
|EXAMPLE t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)||EXAMPLE 3'ABL1 / 5'BCR||EXAMPLE der(22)||EXAMPLE 20% (COSMIC)
EXAMPLE 30% (add reference)
|Yes
|No
|Yes
|EXAMPLE
The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference).
|}
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
Some rearrangements have been seen as secondary abnormalities.
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
!Chromosomal Rearrangement!!Genes in Fusion (5’ or 3’ Segments)!!Pathogenic Derivative!!Prevalence
|-
|-
|del(X)(p22.33p22.33)/del(Y)(p11.32p11.32)||''P2RY8-CRLF2''||der(X)/der(Y)||
|del(X)(p22.33p22.33)/del(Y)(p11.32p11.32)||''P2RY8-CRLF2''||der(X)/der(Y)||
|
|
|
|Because of the unique nature of the iAMP21 abnormality, cases that present with additional genomic lesions that may suggest another category, such as a CRLF2 rearrangement, should still be classified as B-ALL with iAMP21.
|-
|-
|t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1)||''ETV6-RUNX1''||der(21)||
|t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1)
|''ETV6-RUNX1''
|der(21)
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)
|t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)
Line 127: Line 130:
|der(22)
|der(22)
|
|
|}
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|}


==Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH==
Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Includes aberrations not involving gene rearrangements. Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information can be provided in the notes section. Can refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.'') </span>
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
!Chr #!!Gain, Loss, Amp, LOH!!Minimal Region Cytoband and/or Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build; Size]!!Relevant Gene(s)
!Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T
!Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source)
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
7
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Loss
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
chr7
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
Unknown
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> No
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference).  Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add references).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
8
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Gain
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
chr8
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
Unknown
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add references).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
17
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Amp
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
17q12; chr17:39,700,064-39,728,658 [hg38; 28.6 kb]
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
''ERBB2''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P, T
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
Amplification of ''ERBB2'' is associated with HER2 overexpression in HER2 positive breast cancer (add references). Add criteria for how amplification is defined.
|-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}


<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Clinical Significance (Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications).|Please incorporate this section into the relevant tables found in:
* Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)
* Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
* Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns
* Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)}}


Pediatric iAMP21 has been associated with a poor outcome. It displays an increased rate of relapse when treated on standard protocols. Further, the event-free survival and overall survival were significantly worse for individuals with the iAMP21 and standard-risk B-ALL, but not significant in individuals with iAMP21 and high-risk B-ALL.
Cytogenetic morphology of the abnormal chromosome 21 can vary markedly between patients.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Harewood|first=L.|last2=Robinson|first2=H.|last3=Harris|first3=R.|last4=Al-Obaidi|first4=M. Jabbar|last5=Jalali|first5=G. R.|last6=Martineau|first6=M.|last7=Moorman|first7=A. V.|last8=Sumption|first8=N.|last9=Richards|first9=S.|date=2003-03|title=Amplification of AML1 on a duplicated chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study of 20 cases|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12646943|journal=Leukemia|volume=17|issue=3|pages=547–553|doi=10.1038/sj.leu.2402849|issn=0887-6924|pmid=12646943}}</ref>
[[File:IAMP21 met.jpg|center|thumb|875x875px|iAMP21 in a ring formation; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab]]


Because of the unique nature of the iAMP21 abnormality, cases that present with additional genomic lesions that may suggest another category, such as a CRLF2 rearrangement, should still be classified as B-ALL with iAMP21.


</blockquote>
==Individual Region Genomic Gain / Loss / LOH==


Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Includes aberrations not involving gene fusions. Can include references in the table. Can refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable.'') </span>
In ~80% of iAMP21 B-ALL cases, recurrent secondary abnormalities, both chromosomal and molecular, have been documented. Deletions involving particular genes such as; ''IKZF1, CDKN2A/B, PAX5, SH2B3, ETV6'' and ''RB1'' have also been observed.


{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
Line 155: Line 206:
!Notes
!Notes
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE
|X
 
|Gain
7
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
|EXAMPLE Loss
|EXAMPLE


chr7:1- 159,335,973 [hg38]
chr7:1- 159,335,973 [hg38]
|EXAMPLE
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>


chr7
chr7
Line 168: Line 217:
|Yes
|Yes
|No
|No
|EXAMPLE
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>


Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference).  Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference).
Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference).  Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference).
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE
|10
 
|Gain
8
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
|EXAMPLE Gain
|EXAMPLE


chr8:1-145,138,636 [hg38]
chr8:1-145,138,636 [hg38]
|EXAMPLE
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>


chr8
chr8
Line 185: Line 232:
|No
|No
|No
|No
|EXAMPLE
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>


Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference).
Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference).
|}
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
In ~80% of iAMP21 B-ALL cases, recurrent secondary abnormalities, both chromosomal and molecular, have been documented. Deletions involving particular genes such as; ''IKZF1, CDKN2A/B, PAX5, SH2B3, ETV6'' and ''RB1'' have also been observed.
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
!Chromosome Number!!Gain/Loss/Amp/LOH
|-
|X
|Gain
|-
|10
|Gain
|-
|-
|14
|14
|Gain
|Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|7/7q
|7/7q
|Loss
|Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|11q
|11q
|Loss
|Loss
|}
|
|
</blockquote>
|
==Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns==
|
 
|
Put your text here <span style="color:#0070C0">(''EXAMPLE PATTERNS: hyperdiploid; gain of odd number chromosomes including typically chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17; co-deletion of 1p and 19q; complex karyotypes without characteristic genetic findings; chromothripsis'')</span>
|
|}


==Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns==
Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(I''nstructions: Included in this category are alterations such as hyperdiploid; gain of odd number chromosomes including typically chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17; co-deletion of 1p and 19q; complex karyotypes without characteristic genetic findings; chromothripsis; microsatellite instability; homologous recombination deficiency; mutational signature pattern; etc. Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information can be provided in the notes section. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.'')</span>
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
!Chromosomal Pattern
!Chromosomal Pattern
!Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Molecular Pathogenesis
!Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Prevalence -
!Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease)
!Notes
!Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T
!Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source)
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
 
Co-deletion of 1p and 18q
Co-deletion of 1p and 18q
|Yes
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference).
|No
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (Oligodendroglioma)
|No
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P
|EXAMPLE:
|
 
|
See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
Microsatellite instability - hypermutated
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (Endometrial carcinoma)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> P, T
|
|
|-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
|}


<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Characteristic Chromosomal Aberrations / Patterns|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
iAMP21 cases have a characteristic pattern that is both complex and variable. This pattern comprises multiple regions of gain, amplification and deletion. Interestingly, ''RUNX1'' amplification is not always intrachromosomal.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Arber|first=Daniel A.|date=04 2019|title=The 2016 WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia: What the practicing clinician needs to know|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30926096|journal=Seminars in Hematology|volume=56|issue=2|pages=90–95|doi=10.1053/j.seminhematol.2018.08.002|issn=1532-8686|pmid=30926096}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Ryan C.|last2=Weinberg|first2=Olga K.|last3=Cascio|first3=Michael J.|last4=Dahl|first4=Gary V.|last5=Mitton|first5=Bryan A.|last6=Silverman|first6=Lewis B.|last7=Cherry|first7=Athena M.|last8=Arber|first8=Daniel A.|last9=Ohgami|first9=Robert S.|date=2015-07|title=Cytogenetic Variation of B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Intrachromosomal Amplification of Chromosome 21 (iAMP21): A Multi-Institutional Series Review|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26071468|journal=American Journal of Clinical Pathology|volume=144|issue=1|pages=103–112|doi=10.1309/AJCPLUYF11HQBYRB|issn=1943-7722|pmid=26071468}}</ref> The formation of iAMP21 is considered to be due to breakage-fusion-bridge cycles followed by chromothripsis and other complex structural rearrangements of chromosome 21. Studies, molecular and cytogenetic, have elucidated a common 5.1 Mb region that includes the ''RUNX1'' gene. However, even though ''RUNX1'' is included in the amplified region, there has not yet been any conclusive evidence that ''RUNX1'' is critical in the pathogenesis of disease given that it is not overexpressed in some individuals with this abnormality.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Akkari|first=Yassmine M. N.|last2=Bruyere|first2=Helene|last3=Hagelstrom|first3=R. Tanner|last4=Kanagal-Shamanna|first4=Rashmi|last5=Liu|first5=Jie|last6=Luo|first6=Minjie|last7=Mikhail|first7=Fady M.|last8=Pitel|first8=Beth A.|last9=Raca|first9=Gordana|date=2020-05|title=Evidence-based review of genomic aberrations in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Report from the cancer genomics consortium working group for lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32302940|journal=Cancer Genetics|volume=243|pages=52–72|doi=10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.03.001|issn=2210-7762|pmid=32302940}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Rand|first=Vikki|last2=Parker|first2=Helen|last3=Russell|first3=Lisa J.|last4=Schwab|first4=Claire|last5=Ensor|first5=Hannah|last6=Irving|first6=Julie|last7=Jones|first7=Lisa|last8=Masic|first8=Dino|last9=Minto|first9=Lynne|date=2011-06-23|title=Genomic characterization implicates iAMP21 as a likely primary genetic event in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21527530|journal=Blood|volume=117|issue=25|pages=6848–6855|doi=10.1182/blood-2011-01-329961|issn=1528-0020|pmid=21527530}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hunger|first=Stephen P.|last2=Lu|first2=Xiaomin|last3=Devidas|first3=Meenakshi|last4=Camitta|first4=Bruce M.|last5=Gaynon|first5=Paul S.|last6=Winick|first6=Naomi J.|last7=Reaman|first7=Gregory H.|last8=Carroll|first8=William L.|date=2012-05-10|title=Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22412151|journal=Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|volume=30|issue=14|pages=1663–1669|doi=10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8018|issn=1527-7755|pmc=3383113|pmid=22412151}}</ref>
[[File:IAMP21 CMA .png|center|thumb|861x861px|Characteristic iAMP21 CMA; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab]]
iAMP21 cases have a characteristic pattern that is both complex and variable. This pattern comprises multiple regions of gain, amplification and deletion. Further, it often is accompanied by a terminal deletion of 21q. Interestingly, ''RUNX1'' amplification is not always intrachromosomal.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Arber|first=Daniel A.|date=04 2019|title=The 2016 WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia: What the practicing clinician needs to know|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30926096|journal=Seminars in Hematology|volume=56|issue=2|pages=90–95|doi=10.1053/j.seminhematol.2018.08.002|issn=1532-8686|pmid=30926096}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Ryan C.|last2=Weinberg|first2=Olga K.|last3=Cascio|first3=Michael J.|last4=Dahl|first4=Gary V.|last5=Mitton|first5=Bryan A.|last6=Silverman|first6=Lewis B.|last7=Cherry|first7=Athena M.|last8=Arber|first8=Daniel A.|last9=Ohgami|first9=Robert S.|date=2015-07|title=Cytogenetic Variation of B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Intrachromosomal Amplification of Chromosome 21 (iAMP21): A Multi-Institutional Series Review|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26071468|journal=American Journal of Clinical Pathology|volume=144|issue=1|pages=103–112|doi=10.1309/AJCPLUYF11HQBYRB|issn=1943-7722|pmid=26071468}}</ref>
 
The formation of iAMP21 is considered to be due to breakage-fusion-bridge cycles followed by chromothripsis and other complex structural rearrangements of chromosome 21. Studies, molecular and cytogenetic, have elucidated a common 5.1 Mb region that includes the ''RUNX1'' gene. This is part of the critical region consistently amplified (chr21:32.8-37.9 Mb, GRCh37/hg19). However, even though ''RUNX1'' is included in the amplified region, there has not yet been any conclusive evidence that ''RUNX1'' is critical in the pathogenesis of disease given that it is not overexpressed in some individuals with this abnormality.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Rand|first=Vikki|last2=Parker|first2=Helen|last3=Russell|first3=Lisa J.|last4=Schwab|first4=Claire|last5=Ensor|first5=Hannah|last6=Irving|first6=Julie|last7=Jones|first7=Lisa|last8=Masic|first8=Dino|last9=Minto|first9=Lynne|date=2011-06-23|title=Genomic characterization implicates iAMP21 as a likely primary genetic event in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21527530|journal=Blood|volume=117|issue=25|pages=6848–6855|doi=10.1182/blood-2011-01-329961|issn=1528-0020|pmid=21527530}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hunger|first=Stephen P.|last2=Lu|first2=Xiaomin|last3=Devidas|first3=Meenakshi|last4=Camitta|first4=Bruce M.|last5=Gaynon|first5=Paul S.|last6=Winick|first6=Naomi J.|last7=Reaman|first7=Gregory H.|last8=Carroll|first8=William L.|date=2012-05-10|title=Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22412151|journal=Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|volume=30|issue=14|pages=1663–1669|doi=10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8018|issn=1527-7755|pmc=3383113|pmid=22412151}}</ref>
 
</blockquote>
==Gene Mutations (SNV / INDEL)==
 
Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: This table is not meant to be an exhaustive list; please include only genes/alterations that are recurrent and common as well either disease defining and/or clinically significant. Can include references in the table. For clinical significance, denote associations with FDA-approved therapy (not an extensive list of applicable drugs) and NCCN or other national guidelines if applicable; Can also refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable as well as any high impact papers or reviews of gene mutations in this entity.'') </span>


{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
!Gene; Genetic Alteration!!'''Presumed Mechanism (Tumor Suppressor Gene [TSG] / Oncogene / Other)'''!!'''Prevalence (COSMIC /  TCGA / Other)'''!!'''Concomitant Mutations'''!!'''Mutually Exclusive Mutations'''
!Chromosomal Pattern
!'''Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)'''
!Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Notes
!Notes
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE: TP53; Variable LOF mutations
|Amplification of RUNX1
 
|
EXAMPLE:
|
 
|
EGFR; Exon 20 mutations
|See CMA image displaying the amplification of RUNX1. This is part of the critical region consistently amplified: chr21:32.8-37.9 Mb (hg19).
 
|-
EXAMPLE: BRAF; Activating mutations
|Terminal deletion of 21q
|EXAMPLE: TSG
|
|EXAMPLE: 20% (COSMIC)
 
EXAMPLE: 30% (add Reference)
|EXAMPLE: IDH1 R123H
|EXAMPLE: EGFR amplification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|EXAMPLE:  Excludes hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (add reference).
|}
[[File:IAMP21 CMA .png|center|thumb|1028x1028px|Characteristic iAMP21 CMA; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab]]
<br />
<br />
|}
Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.


==Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)==
Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: This table is not meant to be an exhaustive list; please include only genes/alterations that are recurrent or common as well either disease defining and/or clinically significant. If a gene has multiple mechanisms depending on the type or site of the alteration, add multiple entries in the table. For clinical significance, denote associations with FDA-approved therapy (not an extensive list of applicable drugs) and NCCN or other national guidelines if applicable; Can also refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable as well as any high impact papers or reviews of gene mutations in this entity. Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information such as concomitant and mutually exclusive mutations can be provided in the notes section. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.'') </span>
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
!Gene!!Genetic Alteration!!Tumor Suppressor Gene, Oncogene, Other!!Prevalence -
Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease)
!Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T  
!Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source)
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>''EGFR''


<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
<br />
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Exon 18-21 activating mutations
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Oncogene
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (lung cancer)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> T
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Yes (NCCN)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Exons 18, 19, and 21 mutations are targetable for therapy. Exon 20 T790M variants cause resistance to first generation TKI therapy and are targetable by second and third generation TKIs (add references).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''TP53''; Variable LOF mutations
<br />
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Variable LOF mutations
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Tumor Supressor Gene
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (breast cancer)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> P
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> >90% are somatic; rare germline alterations associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (add reference). Denotes a poor prognosis in breast cancer.
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''BRAF''; Activating mutations
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Activating mutations
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Oncogene
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (melanoma)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> T
|
|
|-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in [https://www.cbioportal.org/ <u>cBioportal</u>], [https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic <u>COSMIC</u>], and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.


In a 2016 paper, it was shown that in the iAMP21-ALL exome, the mutations were more commonly transitions (for example: C>T) than transversions or indels.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> Frequently, mutations in the RAS signaling pathway have been observed. Interestingly, these mutations were observed to coexist in patterns ranging from 2-3 mutated genes to 2-4 mutations in the same gene in one sample. Further, the ''FLT3''-ITD was more prevalent in iAMP21-ALL.<ref name=":2" />  
In a 2016 paper, it was shown that in the iAMP21-ALL exome, the mutations were more commonly transitions (for example: C>T) than transversions or indels.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Ryan|first=S. L.|last2=Matheson|first2=E.|last3=Grossmann|first3=V.|last4=Sinclair|first4=P.|last5=Bashton|first5=M.|last6=Schwab|first6=C.|last7=Towers|first7=W.|last8=Partington|first8=M.|last9=Elliott|first9=A.|date=09 2016|title=The role of the RAS pathway in iAMP21-ALL|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27168466|journal=Leukemia|volume=30|issue=9|pages=1824–1831|doi=10.1038/leu.2016.80|issn=1476-5551|pmc=5017527|pmid=27168466}}</ref> Frequently, mutations in the RAS signaling pathway have been observed. Interestingly, these mutations were observed to coexist in patterns ranging from 2-3 mutated genes to 2-4 mutations in the same gene in one sample. Further, the ''FLT3''-ITD was more prevalent in iAMP21-ALL.<ref name=":2" />


{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
!Gene!!Mutation!!Oncogene/Tumor Suppressor/Other!!Presumed Mechanism (LOF/GOF/Other; Driver/Passenger)!!Prevalence (COSMIC/TCGA/Other)
!Gene; Genetic Alteration!!Presumed Mechanism (Tumor Suppressor Gene [TSG] / Oncogene / Other)!!Prevalence (COSMIC / TCGA / Other)!!Concomitant Mutations!!Mutually Exclusive Mutations
!Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown)
!Notes
|-
|-
|''NRAS''|| || || ||45%
|NRAS
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> TSG
|45%
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> IDH1 R123H
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> EGFR amplification
|
|
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>  Excludes hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (add reference).
|-
|-
|''KRAS''
|KRAS
|
|18%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|18%
|-
|-
|''FLT3''
|''FLT3''
|
|20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|20%
|-
|-
|''PTPN11''
|''PTPN11''
|
|11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|11%
|-
|-
|''BRAF''
|''BRAF''
|
|2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2%
|-
|-
|''NF1''
|''NF1''
|
|2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2%
|}
===Other Mutations===
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
!Type!!Gene/Region/Other
|-
|Concomitant Mutations||EXAMPLE IDH1 R123H
|-
|Secondary Mutations||EXAMPLE Trisomy 7
|-
|Mutually Exclusive||EXAMPLE EGFR Amplification
|}
|}
Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.


</blockquote>
==Epigenomic Alterations==
==Epigenomic Alterations==


Put your text here
N/A


==Genes and Main Pathways Involved==
==Genes and Main Pathways Involved==


Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Can include references in the table.'')</span>
Put your text here and fill in the table
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
!Gene; Genetic Alteration!!Pathway!!Pathophysiologic Outcome
!Gene; Genetic Alteration!!Pathway!!Pathophysiologic Outcome
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE: BRAF and MAP2K1; Activating mutations
|RUNX1
|EXAMPLE: MAPK signaling
|RAS pathway<ref name=":2" />
|EXAMPLE: Increased cell growth and proliferation
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Increased cell growth and proliferation
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE: CDKN2A; Inactivating mutations
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> CDKN2A; Inactivating mutations
|EXAMPLE: Cell cycle regulation
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Cell cycle regulation
|EXAMPLE: Unregulated cell division
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Unregulated cell division
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE:  KMT2C and ARID1A; Inactivating mutations
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>  KMT2C and ARID1A; Inactivating mutations
|EXAMPLE:  Histone modification, chromatin remodeling
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>  Histone modification, chromatin remodeling
|EXAMPLE:  Abnormal gene expression program
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>  Abnormal gene expression program
|}
|}
<blockquote class='blockedit'>{{Box-round|title=v4:Genes and Main Pathways Involved|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}
''[[RUNX1]]''
RAS pathway<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Ryan|first=S. L.|last2=Matheson|first2=E.|last3=Grossmann|first3=V.|last4=Sinclair|first4=P.|last5=Bashton|first5=M.|last6=Schwab|first6=C.|last7=Towers|first7=W.|last8=Partington|first8=M.|last9=Elliott|first9=A.|date=09 2016|title=The role of the RAS pathway in iAMP21-ALL|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27168466|journal=Leukemia|volume=30|issue=9|pages=1824–1831|doi=10.1038/leu.2016.80|issn=1476-5551|pmc=5017527|pmid=27168466}}</ref>
</blockquote>
==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods==
==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods==
Different methodologies are able to detect the iAMP21, such as:
Different methodologies are able to detect the iAMP21, such as:


Line 378: Line 481:
==Familial Forms==
==Familial Forms==


Put your text here <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Include associated hereditary conditions/syndromes that cause this entity or are caused by this entity.'') </span>
N/A


==Additional Information==
==Additional Information==


Put your text here
This disease is <u>defined/characterized</u> as detailed below:
 
*Intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21) is a neoplasm of lymphoblasts that are of the B-cell lineage. It is characterized by amplification of the ''RUNX1'' gene at 21q22.3 on a structurally abnormal chromosome 21. Amplification is defined as ≥5 copies of ''RUNX1'' detected by FISH or ≥3 copies of ''RUNX1'' on a single abnormal chromosome 21.<ref name=":02">Borowitz MJ, et al., (2017). B-Lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with recurrent genetic abnormalities, in World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Revised 4th edition. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Arber DA, Hasserjian RP, Le Beau MM, Orazi A, and Siebert R, Editors. IARC Press: Lyon, France.</ref>
 
The <u>epidemiology/prevalence</u> of this disease is detailed below:
 
*iAMP21 is observed most often in the older pediatric group (median age of 9 years, with a range of 2-30 years). It accounts for ~2% of B-ALL cases including ~2% of standard-risk and 3% of high-risk patients. The incidence in adult B-ALL has not been established; however, it appears to be less prevalent than in the pediatric population.<ref name=":0" />
*Further, patients carrying a rob(15;21)(q10;q10) have an ~2700-fold increased risk of developing iAMP21 ALL compared to the general population. Additionally, patients with a constitutional ring chromosome 21, r(21), may potentially be predisposed to iAMP21 ALL.<ref name=":0" />
 
The <u>clinical features</u> of this disease are detailed below:
 
*~50% of cases are classified as high-risk based on an age of ≥10 years.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Harrison|first=Christine J.|date=2015-02-26|title=Blood Spotlight on iAMP21 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a high-risk pediatric disease|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25608562|journal=Blood|volume=125|issue=9|pages=1383–1386|doi=10.1182/blood-2014-08-569228|issn=1528-0020|pmid=25608562}}</ref> Pediatric iAMP21 has been associated with a poor outcome. It displays an increased rate of relapse when treated on standard protocols. Further, the event-free survival and overall survival were significantly worse for individuals with the iAMP21 and standard-risk B-ALL, but not significant in individuals with iAMP21 and high-risk B-ALL.
*Laboratory findings - Low platelet count; Low WBC count (<50,000/μl)
 
The <u>sites of involvement</u> of this disease are detailed below:
 
*Bone Marrow and peripheral blood
 
The <u>morphologic features</u> of this disease are detailed below:
 
*There are no unique morphological or cytochemical features that distinguish this entity from other types of ALL.<ref name=":02" />
 
The <u>immunophenotype</u> of this disease is detailed below:
 
*No detailed information is known, other than these cases occur exclusively in B-ALL.<ref name=":02" />


==Links==
==Links==


[[RUNX1]]
[[RUNX1]]
Put your links here (use "Link" icon at top of page)


==References==
==References==
(use the "Cite" icon at the top of the page) <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Add each reference into the text above by clicking on where you want to insert the reference, selecting the “Cite” icon at the top of the page, and using the “Automatic” tab option to search such as by PMID to select the reference to insert. The reference list in this section will be automatically generated and sorted.''</span> <span style="color:#0070C0">''If a PMID is not available, such as for a book, please use the “Cite” icon, select “Manual” and then “Basic Form”, and include the entire reference''</span><span style="color:#0070C0">''.''</span><span style="color:#0070C0">) </span> <references />
(use the "Cite" icon at the top of the page) <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Add each reference into the text above by clicking where you want to insert the reference, selecting the “Cite” icon at the top of the wiki page, and using the “Automatic” tab option to search by PMID to select the reference to insert. If a PMID is not available, such as for a book, please use the “Cite” icon, select “Manual” and then “Basic Form”, and include the entire reference. To insert the same reference again later in the page, select the “Cite” icon and “Re-use” to find the reference; DO NOT insert the same reference twice using the “Automatic” tab as it will be treated as two separate references. The reference list in this section will be automatically generated and sorted''</span><span style="color:#0070C0">''.''</span><span style="color:#0070C0">)</span> <references />


'''
<br />


==Notes==
==Notes==
<nowiki>*</nowiki>Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page.  If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the CCGA coordinators (contact information provided on the homepage)Additional global feedback or concerns are also welcome.
<nowiki>*</nowiki>Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page.  If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the [[Leadership|''<u>Associate Editor</u>'']] or other CCGA representativeWhen pages have a major update, the new author will be acknowledged at the beginning of the page, and those who contributed previously will be acknowledged below as a prior author.
 
Prior Author(s): 
 
       
<nowiki>*</nowiki>''Citation of this Page'': “B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated {{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}, <nowiki>https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:B-lymphoblastic_leukaemia/lymphoma_with_iAMP21</nowiki>.
<nowiki>*</nowiki>''Citation of this Page'': “B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated {{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}, <nowiki>https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:B-lymphoblastic_leukaemia/lymphoma_with_iAMP21</nowiki>.
[[Category:HAEM5]][[Category:DISEASE]][[Category:Diseases B]]
[[Category:HAEM5]]
[[Category:DISEASE]]
[[Category:Diseases B]]

Latest revision as of 12:11, 3 July 2025

Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO Classification, 5th ed.)


Primary Author(s)*

Holli M. Drendel, PhD, FACMGG, Carolinas Pathology Group, Charlotte

WHO Classification of Disease

Structure Disease
Book Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.)
Category B-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas
Family Precursor B-cell neoplasms
Type B-lymphoblastic leukaemias/lymphomas
Subtype(s) B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21

Related Terminology

Acceptable N/A
Not Recommended N/A

Gene Rearrangements

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information can be provided in the notes section. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.)

Driver Gene Fusion(s) and Common Partner Genes Molecular Pathogenesis Typical Chromosomal Alteration(s) Prevalence -Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
EXAMPLE: ABL1 EXAMPLE: BCR::ABL1 EXAMPLE: The pathogenic derivative is the der(22) resulting in fusion of 5’ BCR and 3’ABL1. EXAMPLE: t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) EXAMPLE: Common (CML) EXAMPLE: D, P, T EXAMPLE: Yes (WHO, NCCN) EXAMPLE:

The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference). BCR::ABL1 is generally favorable in CML (add reference).

EXAMPLE: CIC EXAMPLE: CIC::DUX4 EXAMPLE: Typically, the last exon of CIC is fused to DUX4. The fusion breakpoint in CIC is usually intra-exonic and removes an inhibitory sequence, upregulating PEA3 genes downstream of CIC including ETV1, ETV4, and ETV5. EXAMPLE: t(4;19)(q25;q13) EXAMPLE: Common (CIC-rearranged sarcoma) EXAMPLE: D EXAMPLE:

DUX4 has many homologous genes; an alternate translocation in a minority of cases is t(10;19), but this is usually indistinguishable from t(4;19) by short-read sequencing (add references).

EXAMPLE: ALK EXAMPLE: ELM4::ALK


Other fusion partners include KIF5B, NPM1, STRN, TFG, TPM3, CLTC, KLC1

EXAMPLE: Fusions result in constitutive activation of the ALK tyrosine kinase. The most common ALK fusion is EML4::ALK, with breakpoints in intron 19 of ALK. At the transcript level, a variable (5’) partner gene is fused to 3’ ALK at exon 20. Rarely, ALK fusions contain exon 19 due to breakpoints in intron 18. EXAMPLE: N/A EXAMPLE: Rare (Lung adenocarcinoma) EXAMPLE: T EXAMPLE:

Both balanced and unbalanced forms are observed by FISH (add references).

EXAMPLE: ABL1 EXAMPLE: N/A EXAMPLE: Intragenic deletion of exons 2–7 in EGFR removes the ligand-binding domain, resulting in a constitutively active tyrosine kinase with downstream activation of multiple oncogenic pathways. EXAMPLE: N/A EXAMPLE: Recurrent (IDH-wildtype Glioblastoma) EXAMPLE: D, P, T

Some rearrangements have been seen as secondary abnormalities.

Chromosomal Rearrangement Genes in Fusion (5’ or 3’ Segments) Pathogenic Derivative Prevalence Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
del(X)(p22.33p22.33)/del(Y)(p11.32p11.32) P2RY8-CRLF2 der(X)/der(Y) Because of the unique nature of the iAMP21 abnormality, cases that present with additional genomic lesions that may suggest another category, such as a CRLF2 rearrangement, should still be classified as B-ALL with iAMP21.
t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1) ETV6-RUNX1 der(21)
t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) BCR-ABL1 der(22)

Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Includes aberrations not involving gene rearrangements. Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information can be provided in the notes section. Can refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.)

Chr # Gain, Loss, Amp, LOH Minimal Region Cytoband and/or Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build; Size] Relevant Gene(s) Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
EXAMPLE:

7

EXAMPLE: Loss EXAMPLE:

chr7

EXAMPLE:

Unknown

EXAMPLE: D, P EXAMPLE: No EXAMPLE:

Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference).  Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add references).

EXAMPLE:

8

EXAMPLE: Gain EXAMPLE:

chr8

EXAMPLE:

Unknown

EXAMPLE: D, P EXAMPLE:

Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add references).

EXAMPLE:

17

EXAMPLE: Amp EXAMPLE:

17q12; chr17:39,700,064-39,728,658 [hg38; 28.6 kb]

EXAMPLE:

ERBB2

EXAMPLE: D, P, T EXAMPLE:

Amplification of ERBB2 is associated with HER2 overexpression in HER2 positive breast cancer (add references). Add criteria for how amplification is defined.


Cytogenetic morphology of the abnormal chromosome 21 can vary markedly between patients.[1]

iAMP21 in a ring formation; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab


In ~80% of iAMP21 B-ALL cases, recurrent secondary abnormalities, both chromosomal and molecular, have been documented. Deletions involving particular genes such as; IKZF1, CDKN2A/B, PAX5, SH2B3, ETV6 and RB1 have also been observed.

Chr # Gain / Loss / Amp / LOH Minimal Region Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build] Minimal Region Cytoband Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
X Gain EXAMPLE:

chr7:1- 159,335,973 [hg38]

EXAMPLE:

chr7

Yes Yes No EXAMPLE:

Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference).  Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference).

10 Gain EXAMPLE:

chr8:1-145,138,636 [hg38]

EXAMPLE:

chr8

No No No EXAMPLE:

Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference).

14 Gain
7/7q Loss
11q Loss

Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Included in this category are alterations such as hyperdiploid; gain of odd number chromosomes including typically chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17; co-deletion of 1p and 19q; complex karyotypes without characteristic genetic findings; chromothripsis; microsatellite instability; homologous recombination deficiency; mutational signature pattern; etc. Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information can be provided in the notes section. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.)

Chromosomal Pattern Molecular Pathogenesis Prevalence -

Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease)

Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
EXAMPLE:

Co-deletion of 1p and 18q

EXAMPLE: See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference). EXAMPLE: Common (Oligodendroglioma) EXAMPLE: D, P
EXAMPLE:

Microsatellite instability - hypermutated

EXAMPLE: Common (Endometrial carcinoma) EXAMPLE: P, T

iAMP21 cases have a characteristic pattern that is both complex and variable. This pattern comprises multiple regions of gain, amplification and deletion. Interestingly, RUNX1 amplification is not always intrachromosomal.[2][3] The formation of iAMP21 is considered to be due to breakage-fusion-bridge cycles followed by chromothripsis and other complex structural rearrangements of chromosome 21. Studies, molecular and cytogenetic, have elucidated a common 5.1 Mb region that includes the RUNX1 gene. However, even though RUNX1 is included in the amplified region, there has not yet been any conclusive evidence that RUNX1 is critical in the pathogenesis of disease given that it is not overexpressed in some individuals with this abnormality.[4][5][6]

Chromosomal Pattern Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
Amplification of RUNX1 See CMA image displaying the amplification of RUNX1. This is part of the critical region consistently amplified: chr21:32.8-37.9 Mb (hg19).
Terminal deletion of 21q
Characteristic iAMP21 CMA; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab


Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: This table is not meant to be an exhaustive list; please include only genes/alterations that are recurrent or common as well either disease defining and/or clinically significant. If a gene has multiple mechanisms depending on the type or site of the alteration, add multiple entries in the table. For clinical significance, denote associations with FDA-approved therapy (not an extensive list of applicable drugs) and NCCN or other national guidelines if applicable; Can also refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable as well as any high impact papers or reviews of gene mutations in this entity. Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information such as concomitant and mutually exclusive mutations can be provided in the notes section. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.)

Gene Genetic Alteration Tumor Suppressor Gene, Oncogene, Other Prevalence -

Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease)

Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T   Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
EXAMPLE:EGFR


EXAMPLE: Exon 18-21 activating mutations EXAMPLE: Oncogene EXAMPLE: Common (lung cancer) EXAMPLE: T EXAMPLE: Yes (NCCN) EXAMPLE: Exons 18, 19, and 21 mutations are targetable for therapy. Exon 20 T790M variants cause resistance to first generation TKI therapy and are targetable by second and third generation TKIs (add references).
EXAMPLE: TP53; Variable LOF mutations


EXAMPLE: Variable LOF mutations EXAMPLE: Tumor Supressor Gene EXAMPLE: Common (breast cancer) EXAMPLE: P EXAMPLE: >90% are somatic; rare germline alterations associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (add reference). Denotes a poor prognosis in breast cancer.
EXAMPLE: BRAF; Activating mutations EXAMPLE: Activating mutations EXAMPLE: Oncogene EXAMPLE: Common (melanoma) EXAMPLE: T

Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal, COSMIC, and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.

In a 2016 paper, it was shown that in the iAMP21-ALL exome, the mutations were more commonly transitions (for example: C>T) than transversions or indels.[4][7] Frequently, mutations in the RAS signaling pathway have been observed. Interestingly, these mutations were observed to coexist in patterns ranging from 2-3 mutated genes to 2-4 mutations in the same gene in one sample. Further, the FLT3-ITD was more prevalent in iAMP21-ALL.[7]

Gene; Genetic Alteration Presumed Mechanism (Tumor Suppressor Gene [TSG] / Oncogene / Other) Prevalence (COSMIC / TCGA / Other) Concomitant Mutations Mutually Exclusive Mutations Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
NRAS EXAMPLE: TSG 45% EXAMPLE: IDH1 R123H EXAMPLE: EGFR amplification EXAMPLE:  Excludes hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (add reference).
KRAS 18%
FLT3 20%
PTPN11 11%
BRAF 2%
NF1 2%

Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.

Epigenomic Alterations

N/A

Genes and Main Pathways Involved

Put your text here and fill in the table

Gene; Genetic Alteration Pathway Pathophysiologic Outcome
RUNX1 RAS pathway[7] EXAMPLE: Increased cell growth and proliferation
EXAMPLE: CDKN2A; Inactivating mutations EXAMPLE: Cell cycle regulation EXAMPLE: Unregulated cell division
EXAMPLE:  KMT2C and ARID1A; Inactivating mutations EXAMPLE:  Histone modification, chromatin remodeling EXAMPLE:  Abnormal gene expression program

Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods

Different methodologies are able to detect the iAMP21, such as:

  • Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) utilizing the probe set for the t(12;21)
  • Conventional chromosome analysis
  • Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)
  • Chromosomal microarray (CMA)
  • Next generation sequencing (NGS).

Familial Forms

N/A

Additional Information

This disease is defined/characterized as detailed below:

  • Intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21) is a neoplasm of lymphoblasts that are of the B-cell lineage. It is characterized by amplification of the RUNX1 gene at 21q22.3 on a structurally abnormal chromosome 21. Amplification is defined as ≥5 copies of RUNX1 detected by FISH or ≥3 copies of RUNX1 on a single abnormal chromosome 21.[8]

The epidemiology/prevalence of this disease is detailed below:

  • iAMP21 is observed most often in the older pediatric group (median age of 9 years, with a range of 2-30 years). It accounts for ~2% of B-ALL cases including ~2% of standard-risk and 3% of high-risk patients. The incidence in adult B-ALL has not been established; however, it appears to be less prevalent than in the pediatric population.[4]
  • Further, patients carrying a rob(15;21)(q10;q10) have an ~2700-fold increased risk of developing iAMP21 ALL compared to the general population. Additionally, patients with a constitutional ring chromosome 21, r(21), may potentially be predisposed to iAMP21 ALL.[4]

The clinical features of this disease are detailed below:

  • ~50% of cases are classified as high-risk based on an age of ≥10 years.[9] Pediatric iAMP21 has been associated with a poor outcome. It displays an increased rate of relapse when treated on standard protocols. Further, the event-free survival and overall survival were significantly worse for individuals with the iAMP21 and standard-risk B-ALL, but not significant in individuals with iAMP21 and high-risk B-ALL.
  • Laboratory findings - Low platelet count; Low WBC count (<50,000/μl)

The sites of involvement of this disease are detailed below:

  • Bone Marrow and peripheral blood

The morphologic features of this disease are detailed below:

  • There are no unique morphological or cytochemical features that distinguish this entity from other types of ALL.[8]

The immunophenotype of this disease is detailed below:

  • No detailed information is known, other than these cases occur exclusively in B-ALL.[8]

Links

RUNX1

References

(use the "Cite" icon at the top of the page) (Instructions: Add each reference into the text above by clicking where you want to insert the reference, selecting the “Cite” icon at the top of the wiki page, and using the “Automatic” tab option to search by PMID to select the reference to insert. If a PMID is not available, such as for a book, please use the “Cite” icon, select “Manual” and then “Basic Form”, and include the entire reference. To insert the same reference again later in the page, select the “Cite” icon and “Re-use” to find the reference; DO NOT insert the same reference twice using the “Automatic” tab as it will be treated as two separate references. The reference list in this section will be automatically generated and sorted.)

  1. Harewood, L.; et al. (2003-03). "Amplification of AML1 on a duplicated chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study of 20 cases". Leukemia. 17 (3): 547–553. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2402849. ISSN 0887-6924. PMID 12646943. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. Arber, Daniel A. (04 2019). "The 2016 WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia: What the practicing clinician needs to know". Seminars in Hematology. 56 (2): 90–95. doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2018.08.002. ISSN 1532-8686. PMID 30926096. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. Johnson, Ryan C.; et al. (2015-07). "Cytogenetic Variation of B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Intrachromosomal Amplification of Chromosome 21 (iAMP21): A Multi-Institutional Series Review". American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 144 (1): 103–112. doi:10.1309/AJCPLUYF11HQBYRB. ISSN 1943-7722. PMID 26071468. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Akkari, Yassmine M. N.; et al. (2020-05). "Evidence-based review of genomic aberrations in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Report from the cancer genomics consortium working group for lymphoblastic leukemia". Cancer Genetics. 243: 52–72. doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.03.001. ISSN 2210-7762. PMID 32302940 Check |pmid= value (help). Check date values in: |date= (help)
  5. Rand, Vikki; et al. (2011-06-23). "Genomic characterization implicates iAMP21 as a likely primary genetic event in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Blood. 117 (25): 6848–6855. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-329961. ISSN 1528-0020. PMID 21527530.
  6. Hunger, Stephen P.; et al. (2012-05-10). "Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group". Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 30 (14): 1663–1669. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8018. ISSN 1527-7755. PMC 3383113. PMID 22412151.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Ryan, S. L.; et al. (09 2016). "The role of the RAS pathway in iAMP21-ALL". Leukemia. 30 (9): 1824–1831. doi:10.1038/leu.2016.80. ISSN 1476-5551. PMC 5017527. PMID 27168466. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Borowitz MJ, et al., (2017). B-Lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with recurrent genetic abnormalities, in World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Revised 4th edition. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Arber DA, Hasserjian RP, Le Beau MM, Orazi A, and Siebert R, Editors. IARC Press: Lyon, France.
  9. Harrison, Christine J. (2015-02-26). "Blood Spotlight on iAMP21 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), a high-risk pediatric disease". Blood. 125 (9): 1383–1386. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-08-569228. ISSN 1528-0020. PMID 25608562.


Notes

*Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page.  If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the Associate Editor or other CCGA representative.  When pages have a major update, the new author will be acknowledged at the beginning of the page, and those who contributed previously will be acknowledged below as a prior author.

Prior Author(s):


*Citation of this Page: “B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated 07/3/2025, https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:B-lymphoblastic_leukaemia/lymphoma_with_iAMP21.