HAEM5:Chronic eosinophilic leukaemia: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Bailey.Glen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bailey.Glen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Under Construction}} | {{Under Construction}} | ||
<blockquote class= | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=Content Update To WHO 5th Edition Classification Is In Process; Content Below is Based on WHO 4th Edition Classification|This page was converted to the new template on 2023-12-07. The original page can be found at [[HAEM4:Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia, Not Otherwise Specified]]. | ||
}}</blockquote> | }}</blockquote> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Pending Review* | Pending Review* | ||
==WHO Classification of Disease== | ==WHO Classification of Disease== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 36: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== | ==Related Terminology== | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ | |+ | ||
|Acceptable | |Acceptable | ||
| | |Chronic eosinophilic leukaemia NOS | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Not Recommended | |Not Recommended | ||
| | |N/A | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 194: | Line 110: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<blockquote class= | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=v4:Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote> | ||
No single or specific genetic abnormality has been identified in CEL, NOS. Rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 excludes the diagnosis of CEL, NOS. PCM1-JAK2, ETV6-JAK2, or BCR-JAK2 are also specifically excluded. [1] Three unique cases of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia have shown ''FLT3'' rearrangement: one with t(13;14)(q12;q32)/''TRIP11-FLT3'' rearrangement, and two with ''ETV6-FLT3''. Eosinophilia and ''FLT3'' rearrangement typically shows myeloproliferative neoplasms, most frequently CEL, NOS, and T-ALL. [5] A unique case of CEL,NOS with a novel fusion gene between exon 22 of GCC2 and exon 12 of PDGFRB was detected and confirmed by PCR in a 54 year old man presenting with cough and dyspnea. [6] | No single or specific genetic abnormality has been identified in CEL, NOS. Rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 excludes the diagnosis of CEL, NOS. PCM1-JAK2, ETV6-JAK2, or BCR-JAK2 are also specifically excluded. [1] Three unique cases of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia have shown ''FLT3'' rearrangement: one with t(13;14)(q12;q32)/''TRIP11-FLT3'' rearrangement, and two with ''ETV6-FLT3''. Eosinophilia and ''FLT3'' rearrangement typically shows myeloproliferative neoplasms, most frequently CEL, NOS, and T-ALL. [5] A unique case of CEL,NOS with a novel fusion gene between exon 22 of GCC2 and exon 12 of PDGFRB was detected and confirmed by PCR in a 54 year old man presenting with cough and dyspnea. [6] | ||
| Line 213: | Line 129: | ||
<blockquote class= | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=v4:Clinical Significance (Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications).|Please incorporate this section into the relevant tables found in: | ||
* Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions) | * Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions) | ||
* Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH | * Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH | ||
| Line 231: | Line 147: | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Chr #!! | !Chr #!!Gain, Loss, Amp, LOH!!Minimal Region Cytoband and/or Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build; Size]!!Relevant Gene(s) | ||
! | !Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | ||
! | !Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | ||
! | !Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | ||
| Line 281: | Line 197: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<blockquote class= | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=v4:Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote> | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
| Line 304: | Line 220: | ||
!Chromosomal Pattern | !Chromosomal Pattern | ||
!Molecular Pathogenesis | !Molecular Pathogenesis | ||
! | !Prevalence - | ||
Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) | |||
! | !Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | ||
! | !Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | ||
! | !Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | ||
| Line 334: | Line 250: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<blockquote class= | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=v4:Characteristic Chromosomal Aberrations / Patterns|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote> | ||
A recurrent karyotypic abnormality typically observed in myeloid disorders such as gain of chromosome 8, loss of chromosome 7 or isochromosome 17q supports a diagnosis as well as the presence of a translocation. [1] [1] Morsia et al demonstrated cytogenetic abnormalities in 15 of 17 (88.2%) patients diagnosed with CEL, NOS including trisomy 8 (n = 4), and complex karyotype (n = 3). [4] | A recurrent karyotypic abnormality typically observed in myeloid disorders such as gain of chromosome 8, loss of chromosome 7 or isochromosome 17q supports a diagnosis as well as the presence of a translocation. [1] [1] Morsia et al demonstrated cytogenetic abnormalities in 15 of 17 (88.2%) patients diagnosed with CEL, NOS including trisomy 8 (n = 4), and complex karyotype (n = 3). [4] | ||
| Line 348: | Line 264: | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Gene!! | !Gene!!Genetic Alteration!!Tumor Suppressor Gene, Oncogene, Other!!Prevalence - | ||
Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) | |||
! | !Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | ||
! | !Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | ||
! | !Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>''EGFR'' | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>''EGFR'' | ||
| Line 390: | Line 306: | ||
|}Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in [https://www.cbioportal.org/ <u>cBioportal</u>], [https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic <u>COSMIC</u>], and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content. | |}Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in [https://www.cbioportal.org/ <u>cBioportal</u>], [https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic <u>COSMIC</u>], and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content. | ||
<blockquote class= | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=v4:Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote> | ||
JAK2 mutations have been identified, however mutations in ASXL1, TET2 and EZH2 appear to be common. [1] The study by Morsia et al. of 17 CEL patients demonstrated two patients each with 13q, 20q deletion, and chromosome 1 abnormalities, one patient with monosomy 7 and one with 3q deletion. All seven patients with NGS studies harbored one or more mutations; ''ASXL1'' (42.9%); ''IDH1'' (28.6%), and one each (14.3%) with ''TP53'', ''SRSF2'', ''SH2B3'', ''STAT5B'', ''KDM6A'' and ''NF1'' mutations. [4] A novel ''JAK2'' exon 13 insertion/deletion mutant has been identified and described by Patel et al. in a patient fulfilling diagnostic criteria for both PV and CEL. This study demonstrated that JAK2ex13InDel bears mechanistic resemblance to JAK2V617F but can activate STAT5 in the absence of βc family cytokines IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF, potentially promoting eosinophilic differentiation. [7] Keleman et al. discussed STAT5B mutations as reported in four cases: two cases of CEL, NOS; one case of CMML with eosinophilia; and one case of MDS with eosinophilia, respectively. While the presence of a STAT5B N642H mutation may be a potential marker of chronic eosinophilic neoplasms, similar mutations have been described in nonclonal HE and may not be independently sufficient to establish a diagnosis of CEL, NOS. [8] | JAK2 mutations have been identified, however mutations in ASXL1, TET2 and EZH2 appear to be common. [1] The study by Morsia et al. of 17 CEL patients demonstrated two patients each with 13q, 20q deletion, and chromosome 1 abnormalities, one patient with monosomy 7 and one with 3q deletion. All seven patients with NGS studies harbored one or more mutations; ''ASXL1'' (42.9%); ''IDH1'' (28.6%), and one each (14.3%) with ''TP53'', ''SRSF2'', ''SH2B3'', ''STAT5B'', ''KDM6A'' and ''NF1'' mutations. [4] A novel ''JAK2'' exon 13 insertion/deletion mutant has been identified and described by Patel et al. in a patient fulfilling diagnostic criteria for both PV and CEL. This study demonstrated that JAK2ex13InDel bears mechanistic resemblance to JAK2V617F but can activate STAT5 in the absence of βc family cytokines IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF, potentially promoting eosinophilic differentiation. [7] Keleman et al. discussed STAT5B mutations as reported in four cases: two cases of CEL, NOS; one case of CMML with eosinophilia; and one case of MDS with eosinophilia, respectively. While the presence of a STAT5B N642H mutation may be a potential marker of chronic eosinophilic neoplasms, similar mutations have been described in nonclonal HE and may not be independently sufficient to establish a diagnosis of CEL, NOS. [8] | ||
| Line 444: | Line 360: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<blockquote class= | <blockquote class="blockedit">{{Box-round|title=v4:Genes and Main Pathways Involved|The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.}}</blockquote> | ||
<blockquote class="blockedit"> | <blockquote class="blockedit"> | ||
| Line 463: | Line 379: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
#Bain B.J, et al., (2017). Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, NOS, in World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Revised 4th edition. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Arber DA, Hasserjian RP, Le Beau MM, Orazi A, and Siebert R, Editors. IARC Press: Lyon, France, p54-56 | #Bain B.J, et al., (2017). Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, NOS, in World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, Revised 4th edition. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Arber DA, Hasserjian RP, Le Beau MM, Orazi A, and Siebert R, Editors. IARC Press: Lyon, France, p54-56 | ||
#Ricci, F., Balducci, S., Guerrini, F., Grassi, S., Ciabatti, E., Baratè, C., . . . Galimberti, S. (2020). Sorafenib Induced Complete Cytogenetic and Molecular Response in a Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia Case with t(12;13) Translocation. ''Clinical Hematology International,'' ''2''. doi:10.2991/chi.k.200714.001 | #Ricci, F., Balducci, S., Guerrini, F., Grassi, S., Ciabatti, E., Baratè, C., . . . Galimberti, S. (2020). Sorafenib Induced Complete Cytogenetic and Molecular Response in a Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia Case with t(12;13) Translocation. ''Clinical Hematology International,'' ''2''. doi:10.2991/chi.k.200714.001 | ||
| Line 481: | Line 398: | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki>''Citation of this Page'': “Chronic eosinophilic leukaemia”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated {{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}, <nowiki>https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:Chronic_eosinophilic_leukaemia</nowiki>. | <nowiki>*</nowiki>''Citation of this Page'': “Chronic eosinophilic leukaemia”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated {{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}, <nowiki>https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:Chronic_eosinophilic_leukaemia</nowiki>. | ||
[[Category:HAEM5]][[Category:DISEASE]][[Category:Diseases C]] | [[Category:HAEM5]] | ||
[[Category:DISEASE]] | |||
[[Category:Diseases C]] | |||