HAEM5:B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with hypodiploidy: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [pending revision] |
Bailey.Glen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (65 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with hypodiploidy}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with hypodiploidy}} | ||
[[HAEM5:Table_of_Contents|Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO Classification, 5th ed.)]] | [[HAEM5:Table_of_Contents|Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO Classification, 5th ed.)]] | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
==Primary Author(s)*== | ==Primary Author(s)*== | ||
Miguel Gonzalez Mancera, MD | |||
==WHO Classification of Disease== | ==WHO Classification of Disease== | ||
| Line 51: | Line 48: | ||
==Gene Rearrangements== | ==Gene Rearrangements== | ||
No recurrent gene rearrangements have been described<ref name=":13">WHO Classification of Tumours: Haematolymphoid Tumours [Internet; Beta Version Ahead of Print](5th ed.), International Agency for Research on Cancer (2022)</ref>. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 67: | Line 63: | ||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | ||
The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference). BCR::ABL1 is generally favorable in CML (add reference). | The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference). BCR::ABL1 is generally favorable in CML (add reference). | ||
|} | |} | ||
<blockquote class="blockedit"> | <blockquote class="blockedit"> | ||
<center | <center> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH== | ==Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH== | ||
Hypodiploid B-ALL is characterized by widespread genomic losses consistent with the hypodiploid karyotype<ref name=":13" />. Please refer to section "Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns" below. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 160: | Line 90: | ||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> | ||
Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add references). | Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add references). | ||
|} | |} | ||
<blockquote class="blockedit"> | <blockquote class="blockedit"> | ||
<center | <center> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns== | ==Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns== | ||
This entity is defined by the presence of neoplastic lymphoblasts containing less than 46 chromosomes, and can be subdivided into near-haploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (24–31 chromosomes); low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (32–39 chromosomes); and high-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (40–43 chromosomes)<ref name=":13" /><ref name=":18">{{Cite journal|last=Harrison|first=Christine J.|last2=Moorman|first2=Anthony V.|last3=Broadfield|first3=Zoë J.|last4=Cheung|first4=Kan L.|last5=Harris|first5=Rachel L.|last6=Reza Jalali|first6=G.|last7=Robinson|first7=Hazel M.|last8=Barber|first8=Kerry E.|last9=Richards|first9=Sue M.|date=2004|title=Three distinct subgroups of hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15147369|journal=British Journal of Haematology|volume=125|issue=5|pages=552–559|doi=10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04948.x|issn=0007-1048|pmid=15147369}}</ref>. Of note, near-diploid cases (44–45 chromosomes) are not included in the hypodiploid category in clinical therapy–directed classification schemes because they do not share the poor prognosis observed<ref name=":14" />. In a study, for patients with 44 chromosomes, monosomy 7, the presence of a dicentric chromosome, or both predicted a worse event-free survival (EFS) but similar overall survival (OS)<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Nachman|first=James B.|last2=Heerema|first2=Nyla A.|last3=Sather|first3=Harland|last4=Camitta|first4=Bruce|last5=Forestier|first5=Erik|last6=Harrison|first6=Christine J.|last7=Dastugue|first7=Nicole|last8=Schrappe|first8=Martin|last9=Pui|first9=Ching-Hon|date=2007|title=Outcome of treatment in children with hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17473063|journal=Blood|volume=110|issue=4|pages=1112–1115|doi=10.1182/blood-2006-07-038299|issn=0006-4971|pmc=1939895|pmid=17473063}}</ref>. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 223: | Line 108: | ||
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | !Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|< | |Near-haploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (24–31 chromosomes) | ||
|Near haploidy may be the primary event with loss of chromosomes, followed by a secondary event of doubling of chromosomes indicating uniparental isodisomy (UPID), microdeletions if any may occur after the secondary event<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal|last=Safavi|first=S.|last2=Forestier|first2=E.|last3=Golovleva|first3=I.|last4=Barbany|first4=G.|last5=Nord|first5=K. H.|last6=Moorman|first6=A. V.|last7=Harrison|first7=C. J.|last8=Johansson|first8=B.|last9=Paulsson|first9=K.|date=2013|title=Loss of chromosomes is the primary event in near-haploid and low-hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22889820|journal=Leukemia|volume=27|issue=1|pages=248–250|doi=10.1038/leu.2012.227|issn=1476-5551|pmid=22889820}}</ref>. The chromosomal loss alone may be enough for leukemogenesis and the unconserved random chromosomes may contain specific genes that increase the oncogenic potential of leukemic cells<ref name=":15">{{Cite journal|last=Harrison|first=Christine J.|last2=Moorman|first2=Anthony V.|last3=Barber|first3=Kerry E.|last4=Broadfield|first4=Zoë J.|last5=Cheung|first5=Kan L.|last6=Harris|first6=Rachel L.|last7=Jalali|first7=G. Reza|last8=Robinson|first8=Hazel M.|last9=Strefford|first9=Jonathan C.|date=2005-05|title=Interphase molecular cytogenetic screening for chromosomal abnormalities of prognostic significance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK Cancer Cytogenetics Group Study|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15877734|journal=British Journal of Haematology|volume=129|issue=4|pages=520–530|doi=10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05497.x|issn=0007-1048|pmid=15877734}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Raimondi|first=Susana C.|last2=Zhou|first2=Yinmei|last3=Mathew|first3=Susan|last4=Shurtleff|first4=Sheila A.|last5=Sandlund|first5=John T.|last6=Rivera|first6=Gaston K.|last7=Behm|first7=Frederick G.|last8=Pui|first8=Ching-Hon|date=2003-12-15|title=Reassessment of the prognostic significance of hypodiploidy in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14669294|journal=Cancer|volume=98|issue=12|pages=2715–2722|doi=10.1002/cncr.11841|issn=0008-543X|pmid=14669294}}</ref>. | |||
|< | |Rare (0.5%)<ref name=":8" /> | ||
|< | |D: Needs demonstration of hypodiploidy (≤ 43 chromosomes) by karyotyping and/or FISH analysis; flow cytometry DNA index analysis and/or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis to identify masked hypodiploidy. | ||
|< | P: Associated with poor prognosis<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Safavi|first=Setareh|last2=Paulsson|first2=Kajsa|date=2017|title=Near-haploid and low-hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia: two distinct subtypes with consistently poor prognosis|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27903530|journal=Blood|volume=129|issue=4|pages=420–423|doi=10.1182/blood-2016-10-743765|issn=1528-0020|pmid=27903530}}</ref>. 5-year EFS 25–40%<ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=Panuciak|first=Kinga|last2=Nowicka|first2=Emilia|last3=Mastalerczyk|first3=Angelika|last4=Zawitkowska|first4=Joanna|last5=Niedźwiecki|first5=Maciej|last6=Lejman|first6=Monika|date=2023-05-15|title=Overview on Aneuploidy in Childhood B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37240110|journal=International Journal of Molecular Sciences|volume=24|issue=10|pages=8764|doi=10.3390/ijms24108764|issn=1422-0067|pmc=10218510|pmid=37240110}}</ref>. | ||
| | |||
| | |No (NCCN) | ||
|It has been observed in the pediatric population with virtually no adult cases reported. Nonrandom retention of the X chromosome plus chromosomes 8, 14, 18, and 21 are frequently observed. The most common targets of aneuploidy are chromosomes 1–7, 9, 11–13, 15–17, 19–20 and 22<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Holmfeldt|first=Linda|last2=Wei|first2=Lei|last3=Diaz-Flores|first3=Ernesto|last4=Walsh|first4=Michael|last5=Zhang|first5=Jinghui|last6=Ding|first6=Li|last7=Payne-Turner|first7=Debbie|last8=Churchman|first8=Michelle|last9=Andersson|first9=Anna|date=2013|title=The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23334668|journal=Nature Genetics|volume=45|issue=3|pages=242–252|doi=10.1038/ng.2532|issn=1546-1718|pmc=3919793|pmid=23334668}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Creasey|first=Thomas|last2=Enshaei|first2=Amir|last3=Nebral|first3=Karin|last4=Schwab|first4=Claire|last5=Watts|first5=Kathryn|last6=Cuthbert|first6=Gavin|last7=Vora|first7=Ajay|last8=Moppett|first8=John|last9=Harrison|first9=Christine J.|date=2021-09|title=Single nucleotide polymorphism array-based signature of low hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33938069|journal=Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer|volume=60|issue=9|pages=604–615|doi=10.1002/gcc.22956|issn=1098-2264|pmc=8600946|pmid=33938069}}</ref><ref name=":11">{{Cite journal|last=Harrison|first=Christine J.|last2=Moorman|first2=Anthony V.|last3=Broadfield|first3=Zoë J.|last4=Cheung|first4=Kan L.|last5=Harris|first5=Rachel L.|last6=Reza Jalali|first6=G.|last7=Robinson|first7=Hazel M.|last8=Barber|first8=Kerry E.|last9=Richards|first9=Sue M.|date=2004-06|title=Three distinct subgroups of hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15147369|journal=British Journal of Haematology|volume=125|issue=5|pages=552–559|doi=10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04948.x|issn=0007-1048|pmid=15147369}}</ref><ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last=Mühlbacher|first=Verena|last2=Zenger|first2=Melanie|last3=Schnittger|first3=Susanne|last4=Weissmann|first4=Sandra|last5=Kunze|first5=Franziska|last6=Kohlmann|first6=Alexander|last7=Bellos|first7=Frauke|last8=Kern|first8=Wolfgang|last9=Haferlach|first9=Torsten|date=2014|title=Acute lymphoblastic leukemia with low hypodiploid/near triploid karyotype is a specific clinical entity and exhibits a very high TP53 mutation frequency of 93%|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24619868|journal=Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer|volume=53|issue=6|pages=524–536|doi=10.1002/gcc.22163|issn=1098-2264|pmid=24619868}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite journal|last=Holmfeldt|first=Linda|last2=Wei|first2=Lei|last3=Diaz-Flores|first3=Ernesto|last4=Walsh|first4=Michael|last5=Zhang|first5=Jinghui|last6=Ding|first6=Li|last7=Payne-Turner|first7=Debbie|last8=Churchman|first8=Michelle|last9=Andersson|first9=Anna|date=2013-03|title=The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23334668|journal=Nature Genetics|volume=45|issue=3|pages=242–252|doi=10.1038/ng.2532|issn=1546-1718|pmc=3919793|pmid=23334668}}</ref>. | |||
Near-haploid and low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL may undergo doubling, resulting in a pseudohyperdiploid or near-triploid clone containing up to 78 chromosomes, and can present as a diagnostic challenge. If the original hypodiploid clone is not present, the hypodiploidy is regarded as masked, and the case may be mistaken for high-hyperdiploid B-ALL/LBL, resulting in an inappropriate prognostication<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Carroll|first=Andrew J.|last2=Shago|first2=Mary|last3=Mikhail|first3=Fady M.|last4=Raimondi|first4=Susana C.|last5=Hirsch|first5=Betsy A.|last6=Loh|first6=Mignon L.|last7=Raetz|first7=Elizabeth A.|last8=Borowitz|first8=Michael J.|last9=Wood|first9=Brent L.|date=2019-10|title=Masked hypodiploidy: Hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) mimicking hyperdiploid ALL in children: A report from the Children's Oncology Group|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31425927|journal=Cancer Genetics|volume=238|pages=62–68|doi=10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.07.009|issn=2210-7762|pmc=6768693|pmid=31425927}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Creasey|first=Thomas|last2=Enshaei|first2=Amir|last3=Nebral|first3=Karin|last4=Schwab|first4=Claire|last5=Watts|first5=Kathryn|last6=Cuthbert|first6=Gavin|last7=Vora|first7=Ajay|last8=Moppett|first8=John|last9=Harrison|first9=Christine J.|date=2021-09|title=Single nucleotide polymorphism array-based signature of low hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33938069|journal=Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer|volume=60|issue=9|pages=604–615|doi=10.1002/gcc.22956|issn=1098-2264|pmc=8600946|pmid=33938069}}</ref>. The two subtypes may be differentiated by SNP array analysis, demonstrating copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity for doubled monosomic chromosomes. The DNA index assessed by flow cytometry may also be helpful if distinct peaks representing the hypodiploid and doubled clones are both detectable<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Yu|first=Chih-Hsiang|last2=Lin|first2=Tze-Kang|last3=Jou|first3=Shiann-Tarng|last4=Lin|first4=Chien-Yu|last5=Lin|first5=Kai-Hsin|last6=Lu|first6=Meng-Yao|last7=Chen|first7=Shu-Huey|last8=Cheng|first8=Chao-Neng|last9=Wu|first9=Kang-Hsi|date=2020-07-13|title=MLPA and DNA index improve the molecular diagnosis of childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32661308|journal=Scientific Reports|volume=10|issue=1|pages=11501|doi=10.1038/s41598-020-68311-9|issn=2045-2322|pmc=7359332|pmid=32661308}}</ref>. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|< | |Low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (32–39 chromosomes) | ||
|More than 90% of low-hypodiploid patients have been identified with ''TP53'' mutations, which occur in virtually all low-hypodiploid B-ALL cases due to the very recurrent loss of chromosome 17<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":9">{{Cite journal|last=Safavi|first=Setareh|last2=Olsson|first2=Linda|last3=Biloglav|first3=Andrea|last4=Veerla|first4=Srinivas|last5=Blendberg|first5=Molly|last6=Tayebwa|first6=Johnbosco|last7=Behrendtz|first7=Mikael|last8=Castor|first8=Anders|last9=Hansson|first9=Markus|date=2015|title=Genetic and epigenetic characterization of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26544893|journal=Oncotarget|volume=6|issue=40|pages=42793–42802|doi=10.18632/oncotarget.6000|issn=1949-2553|pmc=4767471|pmid=26544893}}</ref><ref name=":10">{{Cite journal|last=Stengel|first=Anna|last2=Schnittger|first2=Susanne|last3=Weissmann|first3=Sandra|last4=Kuznia|first4=Sabrina|last5=Kern|first5=Wolfgang|last6=Kohlmann|first6=Alexander|last7=Haferlach|first7=Torsten|last8=Haferlach|first8=Claudia|date=2014-07-10|title=TP53 mutations occur in 15.7% of ALL and are associated with MYC-rearrangement, low hypodiploidy, and a poor prognosis|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24829203|journal=Blood|volume=124|issue=2|pages=251–258|doi=10.1182/blood-2014-02-558833|issn=1528-0020|pmid=24829203}}</ref>. p53 is one of the most prominent tumor suppressors. Its activation as a transcription factor stimulates downstream pathways leading to protective cellular processes, including cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence, to prevent the propagation of genetically altered cells<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Vogelstein|first=B.|last2=Lane|first2=D.|last3=Levine|first3=A. J.|date=2000-11-16|title=Surfing the p53 network|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11099028|journal=Nature|volume=408|issue=6810|pages=307–310|doi=10.1038/35042675|issn=0028-0836|pmid=11099028}}</ref>. | |||
| | |Rare in children, recurrent in adolescents, young adults, and adults | ||
|< | |P: Associated with poor prognosis. EFS 30–50%<ref name=":8" /><ref name=":1" />. | ||
|< | |No (NCCN) | ||
|Low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL is rare in children (< 1%); however, the frequency increases with age, accounting for 5% of B-ALL/LBL cases in adolescents and young adults, and > 10% of cases in adults. Nonrandom retention of two copies of chromosomes from the following: the sex chromosomes plus chromosomes 1,6, 8, 10, 14, 18, and19. Chromosome 21 is almost always retained in two copies. | |||
The most common targets of aneuploidy are chromosomes 2–4, 7, 9, 12–13, 15–17 and 20<ref name=":7" />. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |High-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (40–43 chromosomes) | ||
|Genetic alterations involve ''CDKN2A'' and ''TP53''<ref name=":9" />. | |||
|Rare, occurring in approximately 4% of diagnosed cases of hypodiploidy in both children and adults, but with a predominance of the younger group<ref name=":11" /><ref name=":12">{{Cite journal|last=Moorman|first=Anthony V.|date=2016|title=New and emerging prognostic and predictive genetic biomarkers in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27033238|journal=Haematologica|volume=101|issue=4|pages=407–416|doi=10.3324/haematol.2015.141101|issn=1592-8721|pmc=5004393|pmid=27033238}}</ref>. | |||
|P: Associated with poor prognosis. EFS 75%<ref name=":14">{{Cite journal|last=Pui|first=Ching-Hon|last2=Rebora|first2=Paola|last3=Schrappe|first3=Martin|last4=Attarbaschi|first4=Andishe|last5=Baruchel|first5=Andre|last6=Basso|first6=Giuseppe|last7=Cavé|first7=Hélène|last8=Elitzur|first8=Sarah|last9=Koh|first9=Katsuyoshi|date=2019-04-01|title=Outcome of Children With Hypodiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Multinational Study|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30657737|journal=Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|volume=37|issue=10|pages=770–779|doi=10.1200/JCO.18.00822|issn=1527-7755|pmc=7051863|pmid=30657737}}</ref>. | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
|Chromosome abnormalities include whole chromosome loss, specifically one sex chromosome and often chromosomes 7, 9, and/or 13. Also detected are structural anomalies especially dicentric chromosomes involving chromosomes 7, 9 or 12. | |||
|}<blockquote class="blockedit"> | |||
<center> | |||
''' | |||
<blockquote class="blockedit"> | |||
<center | |||
---- | ---- | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)== | ==Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)== | ||
Holmfeldt et al sequenced 124 cases of low-hypodiploid B-ALL and showed that more than two-thirds (70.6%) of near-haploid ALL cases harbored genetic alterations known or predicted to result in activation of RTK or Ras signaling, including deletion, amplification and/or sequence mutation of ''NF1'', ''NRAS'', ''KRAS'', ''MAPK1'', ''FLT3'' or ''PTPN11<ref name=":2" />''. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 293: | Line 146: | ||
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | !Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|< | |''TP53''<br /> | ||
|The majority are missense mutations located in exon 7, exon 8, exon 6, and exon 5. Less frequent frameshift mutations in exon 4 and 7 have been described<ref name=":6" />. In general are predicted to be loss of function (LOF) mutations. | |||
< | |Tumor supressor gene | ||
|Common (>90%) | |||
|< | |No established significance | ||
|< | |No (NCCN) | ||
|< | |These alterations correlate with low-hypodiploid ALL (32–39 chromosomes) and poorer clinical outcomes<ref name=":2" />. Approximately 50% of children with low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL carry germline ''TP53'' variants associated with Li–Fraumeni syndrome. Accordingly, genetic counseling is recommended for children with low-hypodiploid B-ALL carrying ''TP53'' mutations, and their relatives<ref name=":17" />. In contrast to childhood cases, ''TP53'' mutations in low-hypodiploid adult B-ALL are somatic, are not found in healthy hematopoietic cells, and not detectable in remission samples<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":6" />. | ||
|< | |- | ||
|< | |''RB1'' | ||
|Focal deletion and mutation<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":16">{{Cite journal|last=Molina|first=Oscar|last2=Bataller|first2=Alex|last3=Thampi|first3=Namitha|last4=Ribera|first4=Jordi|last5=Granada|first5=Isabel|last6=Velasco|first6=Pablo|last7=Fuster|first7=José Luis|last8=Menéndez|first8=Pablo|date=2021-12-22|title=Near-Haploidy and Low-Hypodiploidy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: When Less Is Too Much|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35008193|journal=Cancers|volume=14|issue=1|pages=32|doi=10.3390/cancers14010032|issn=2072-6694|pmc=8750410|pmid=35008193}}</ref> | |||
|Tumor supressor gene | |||
|Common | |||
|No established significance | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
|Associated with low-hypodiploid B-ALL. | |||
|- | |||
|''NF1'' | |||
|Mutations and focal deletions. In 68% of the cases, the ''NF1'' deletions were intragenic involving exons 15 through 35. Because of aneuploidy, the ''NF1'' alterations were biallelic in 76.7% of near-haploid cases.<ref name=":2" /> | |||
|Tumor supressor gene | |||
|Mutations: Recurrent | |||
Focal deletions: Common<ref name=":2" /> | |||
|No established significance | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
| rowspan="6" |Involved in RTK/RAS cellular pathway, and associated primarily with near-haploid B-ALL<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":16" />. | |||
|- | |||
|''FLT3'' | |||
|Mutation<ref name=":2" /> | |||
|Oncogene | |||
|Recurrent | |||
|No established significance | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
|- | |||
|''NRAS'' | |||
|Mutation<ref name=":2" /> | |||
|Oncogene | |||
|Recurrent | |||
|No established significance | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
|- | |||
|''KRAS'' | |||
|Mutation<ref name=":2" /> | |||
|Oncogene | |||
|Rare | |||
|No established significance | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
|- | |||
|''MAPK1'' | |||
|Mutation<ref name=":2" /> | |||
|Oncogene | |||
|Rare | |||
|No established significance | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''PTPN11'' | ||
|Mutation<ref name=":2" /> | |||
|< | |Oncoogene | ||
|Rare | |||
| | |No established significance | ||
| | |No (NCCN) | ||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''CDKN2A/B'' | ||
|< | |Focal deletion<ref name=":2" /> | ||
| | |Tumor supressor | ||
| | |Common | ||
| | |No established significance | ||
| | |No (NCCN) | ||
| | |Associated with near-haploid B-ALL and low-hypodiploid B-ALL. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''IKZF2'' | ||
| | |Focal deletion. Alterations of ''IKZF2'' and ''IKZF3'' were biallelic as a result of aneuploidy<ref name=":2" />. | ||
| | |Tumor supressor | ||
| | |Common | ||
| | |No established significance | ||
| | |No (NCCN) | ||
| | |Associated with low-hypodiploid B-ALL. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''IKZF3'' | |||
<br /> | |||
|Focal deletion and one frameshift mutation<ref name=":2" /> | |||
|Tumor supressor | |||
|Recurrent | |||
|No established significance | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
|Associated with near-haploid B-ALL. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''PAG1'' | ||
| | |Focal deletion<ref name=":2" />. Most ''PAG1'' deletions were homozygous and involved the upstream region and first exon, leading to a complete loss of ''PAG1'' expression. | ||
|Tumor supressor | |||
|Recurrent | |||
|No established significance | |||
|No (NCCN) | |||
|Associated with near-haploid B-ALL. It was identified as a putative RAS signaling inhibitor and have a negative regulatory function in proximal B-cell receptor signaling<ref name=":2" />. | |||
|}Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in [https://www.cbioportal.org/ <u>cBioportal</u>], [https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic <u>COSMIC</u>], and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content. | |||
<blockquote class="blockedit"></blockquote> | |||
==Epigenomic Alterations== | ==Epigenomic Alterations== | ||
In near haploid 19% of the cases had focal deletions of histone gene cluster at 6p22, however, non-hypodiploid ALL had 8%, lower frequency of these deletions<ref name=":2" />. | In near haploid 19% of the cases had focal deletions of histone gene cluster at 6p22, however, non-hypodiploid ALL had 8%, lower frequency of these deletions<ref name=":2" />. Of the 25 next generation sequenced haploid cases 16 (64%) cases had twenty six histone modifier gene mutations and of the 15 low hypodiploid ALL cases 9 (60%) cases had 9 mutations; the most common mutation (32%) of the near haploid cases was transcriptional co-activator and histone acetyltransferase ''CREBBP''<ref name=":2" />. | ||
Of the 25 next generation sequenced haploid cases 16 (64%) cases had twenty six histone modifier gene mutations and of the 15 low hypodiploid ALL cases 9 (60%) cases had 9 mutations; the most common mutation (32%) of the near haploid cases was transcriptional co-activator and histone acetyltransferase ''CREBBP''<ref name=":2" />. | |||
==Genes and Main Pathways Involved== | ==Genes and Main Pathways Involved== | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Gene; Genetic Alteration!!Pathway!!Pathophysiologic Outcome | !Gene; Genetic Alteration!!Pathway!!Pathophysiologic Outcome | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''NF1, NRAS, KRAS, MAPK1, FLT3 or PTPN11''; Activating mutations<ref name=":2" /> | ||
|RTK or Ras signaling | |||
| | |Constitutive activation of mitogenic and anti-apoptotic pathways, driving uncontrolled cell proliferation, survival, and malignant transformation. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''CDKN2A/B, TP53, RB1''; Loss of function mutations<ref name=":2" /> | ||
|Cell cycle and apoptosis | |||
| | |Propagation of genetically altered cells. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''IKZF1, IKZF2, IKZF3, PAX5, EBF1, VPREB1''<ref name=":16" /> | ||
|B-cell development | |||
| | |Altered lymphoid development and differentiation. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''PAG1<ref name=":16" />'' | ||
| | |BCR signaling | ||
| | |Altered regulatory function in proximal B cell–receptor signaling. | ||
|- | |||
|''ETV6<ref name=":16" />'' | |||
|Hematopoiesis | |||
|Not fully elucidated in this entity | |||
|- | |||
|''ARPP21<ref name=":16" />'' | |||
|Calmodulin signaling | |||
|Not fully elucidated in this entity | |||
|- | |||
|''SLX4IP<ref name=":16" />'' | |||
|Telomere length maintenance | |||
|Not fully elucidated in this entity | |||
|- | |||
|''CUL5<ref name=":16" />'' | |||
|Ubiquitin pathway | |||
|Not fully elucidated in this entity | |||
|- | |||
|''FAM53B<ref name=":16" />'' | |||
|Wnt signaling | |||
|Not fully elucidated in this entity | |||
|- | |||
|''PDS5B<ref name=":16" />'' | |||
|Cohesis complex | |||
|Not fully elucidated in this entity | |||
|- | |||
|''ANKRD11, DMD<ref name=":16" />'' | |||
|Cell adhesion | |||
|Not fully elucidated in this entity | |||
|} | |} | ||
<blockquote class="blockedit"> | <blockquote class="blockedit"><center> | ||
<center | |||
---- | ---- | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods== | ==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods== | ||
Karyotype, flow cytometry DNA index, FISH, and SNP arrays are all useful in establishing the diagnosis<ref name=":13" />. When using FISH or karyotype, approximately 16% to 30% of the ALL cases yield no or inadequate cytogenetic results due to inadequate specimens and absent or few mitotic cells. Among those with a cytogenetic result, 15% to 25% have a normal karyotype<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Moorman|first=Anthony V.|last2=Ensor|first2=Hannah M.|last3=Richards|first3=Sue M.|last4=Chilton|first4=Lucy|last5=Schwab|first5=Claire|last6=Kinsey|first6=Sally E.|last7=Vora|first7=Ajay|last8=Mitchell|first8=Chris D.|last9=Harrison|first9=Christine J.|date=2010-05|title=Prognostic effect of chromosomal abnormalities in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the UK Medical Research Council ALL97/99 randomised trial|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20409752|journal=The Lancet. Oncology|volume=11|issue=5|pages=429–438|doi=10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70066-8|issn=1474-5488|pmid=20409752}}</ref>. High-resolution SNP array can detect IKZF1 deletions and other cryptic copy number aberrations as well as CN-LOH that are not detectable by chromosome analysis<ref name=":19">{{Cite journal|last=Wang|first=Yunhong|last2=Miller|first2=Sue|last3=Roulston|first3=Diane|last4=Bixby|first4=Dale|last5=Shao|first5=Lina|date=2016|title=Genome-Wide Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Analysis Improves Prognostication of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27161658|journal=The Journal of molecular diagnostics: JMD|volume=18|issue=4|pages=595–603|doi=10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.03.004|issn=1943-7811|pmid=27161658}}</ref>. | |||
==Familial Forms== | ==Familial Forms== | ||
In Low hypodiploid (LH), several studies have not only identified a high percentage of pediatric patients with ''TP53'' mutations, but close to half displayed germline mutations, suggesting that LH ALL is a manifestation of Li-Fraumeni syndrome in children. | In Low hypodiploid (LH), several studies have not only identified a high percentage of pediatric patients with ''TP53'' mutations, but close to half displayed germline mutations, suggesting that LH ALL is a manifestation of Li-Fraumeni syndrome in children<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":10" /><ref name=":17">{{Cite journal|last=Comeaux|first=Evan Q.|last2=Mullighan|first2=Charles G.|date=2017-03-01|title=TP53 Mutations in Hypodiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28003275|journal=Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine|volume=7|issue=3|pages=a026286|doi=10.1101/cshperspect.a026286|issn=2157-1422|pmc=5334249|pmid=28003275}}</ref>. | ||
Adults also showed a high incidence of ''TP53'' mutations, but these mutations appear to be somatic in origin. In NH, mutations of genes of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathway, Ras signaling, ''IKZF3'' (17q21.1) and histone clusters, but mutations of ''IZFK2'', ''RB1'', or ''TP53'' were rare. | Adults also showed a high incidence of ''TP53'' mutations, but these mutations appear to be somatic in origin. In NH, mutations of genes of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathway, Ras signaling, ''IKZF3'' (17q21.1) and histone clusters, but mutations of ''IZFK2'', ''RB1'', or ''TP53'' were rare. | ||
| Line 408: | Line 319: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references /> | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:28, 21 November 2025
Haematolymphoid Tumours (WHO Classification, 5th ed.)
| This page is under construction |
editContent Update To WHO 5th Edition Classification Is In Process; Content Below is Based on WHO 4th Edition ClassificationThis page was converted to the new template on 2023-12-07. The original page can be found at HAEM4:B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma with Hypodiploidy.
(General Instructions – The focus of these pages is the clinically significant genetic alterations in each disease type. This is based on up-to-date knowledge from multiple resources such as PubMed and the WHO classification books. The CCGA is meant to be a supplemental resource to the WHO classification books; the CCGA captures in a continually updated wiki-stye manner the current genetics/genomics knowledge of each disease, which evolves more rapidly than books can be revised and published. If the same disease is described in multiple WHO classification books, the genetics-related information for that disease will be consolidated into a single main page that has this template (other pages would only contain a link to this main page). Use HUGO-approved gene names and symbols (italicized when appropriate), HGVS-based nomenclature for variants, as well as generic names of drugs and testing platforms or assays if applicable. Please complete tables whenever possible and do not delete them (add N/A if not applicable in the table and delete the examples); to add (or move) a row or column in a table, click nearby within the table and select the > symbol that appears. Please do not delete or alter the section headings. The use of bullet points alongside short blocks of text rather than only large paragraphs is encouraged. Additional instructions below in italicized blue text should not be included in the final page content. Please also see Author_Instructions and FAQs as well as contact your Associate Editor or Technical Support.)
Primary Author(s)*
Miguel Gonzalez Mancera, MD
WHO Classification of Disease
| Structure | Disease |
|---|---|
| Book | Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.) |
| Category | B-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas |
| Family | Precursor B-cell neoplasms |
| Type | B-lymphoblastic leukaemias/lymphomas |
| Subtype(s) | B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with hypodiploidy |
Related Terminology
| Acceptable | N/A |
| Not Recommended | N/A |
Gene Rearrangements
No recurrent gene rearrangements have been described[1].
| Driver Gene | Fusion(s) and Common Partner Genes | Molecular Pathogenesis | Typical Chromosomal Alteration(s) | Prevalence -Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) | Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXAMPLE: ABL1 | EXAMPLE: BCR::ABL1 | EXAMPLE: The pathogenic derivative is the der(22) resulting in fusion of 5’ BCR and 3’ABL1. | EXAMPLE: t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) | EXAMPLE: Common (CML) | EXAMPLE: D, P, T | EXAMPLE: Yes (WHO, NCCN) | EXAMPLE:
The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference). BCR::ABL1 is generally favorable in CML (add reference). |
Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
Hypodiploid B-ALL is characterized by widespread genomic losses consistent with the hypodiploid karyotype[1]. Please refer to section "Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns" below.
| Chr # | Gain, Loss, Amp, LOH | Minimal Region Cytoband and/or Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build; Size] | Relevant Gene(s) | Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXAMPLE:
7 |
EXAMPLE: Loss | EXAMPLE:
chr7 |
EXAMPLE:
Unknown |
EXAMPLE: D, P | EXAMPLE: No | EXAMPLE:
Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add references). |
Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns
This entity is defined by the presence of neoplastic lymphoblasts containing less than 46 chromosomes, and can be subdivided into near-haploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (24–31 chromosomes); low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (32–39 chromosomes); and high-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (40–43 chromosomes)[1][2]. Of note, near-diploid cases (44–45 chromosomes) are not included in the hypodiploid category in clinical therapy–directed classification schemes because they do not share the poor prognosis observed[3]. In a study, for patients with 44 chromosomes, monosomy 7, the presence of a dicentric chromosome, or both predicted a worse event-free survival (EFS) but similar overall survival (OS)[4].
| Chromosomal Pattern | Molecular Pathogenesis | Prevalence -
Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) |
Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Near-haploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (24–31 chromosomes) | Near haploidy may be the primary event with loss of chromosomes, followed by a secondary event of doubling of chromosomes indicating uniparental isodisomy (UPID), microdeletions if any may occur after the secondary event[5]. The chromosomal loss alone may be enough for leukemogenesis and the unconserved random chromosomes may contain specific genes that increase the oncogenic potential of leukemic cells[6][7]. | Rare (0.5%)[8] | D: Needs demonstration of hypodiploidy (≤ 43 chromosomes) by karyotyping and/or FISH analysis; flow cytometry DNA index analysis and/or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis to identify masked hypodiploidy.
P: Associated with poor prognosis[4][9]. 5-year EFS 25–40%[8]. |
No (NCCN) | It has been observed in the pediatric population with virtually no adult cases reported. Nonrandom retention of the X chromosome plus chromosomes 8, 14, 18, and 21 are frequently observed. The most common targets of aneuploidy are chromosomes 1–7, 9, 11–13, 15–17, 19–20 and 22[10][11][12][13][14].
Near-haploid and low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL may undergo doubling, resulting in a pseudohyperdiploid or near-triploid clone containing up to 78 chromosomes, and can present as a diagnostic challenge. If the original hypodiploid clone is not present, the hypodiploidy is regarded as masked, and the case may be mistaken for high-hyperdiploid B-ALL/LBL, resulting in an inappropriate prognostication[9][15][16]. The two subtypes may be differentiated by SNP array analysis, demonstrating copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity for doubled monosomic chromosomes. The DNA index assessed by flow cytometry may also be helpful if distinct peaks representing the hypodiploid and doubled clones are both detectable[17]. |
| Low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (32–39 chromosomes) | More than 90% of low-hypodiploid patients have been identified with TP53 mutations, which occur in virtually all low-hypodiploid B-ALL cases due to the very recurrent loss of chromosome 17[13][18][19]. p53 is one of the most prominent tumor suppressors. Its activation as a transcription factor stimulates downstream pathways leading to protective cellular processes, including cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence, to prevent the propagation of genetically altered cells[20]. | Rare in children, recurrent in adolescents, young adults, and adults | P: Associated with poor prognosis. EFS 30–50%[8][9]. | No (NCCN) | Low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL is rare in children (< 1%); however, the frequency increases with age, accounting for 5% of B-ALL/LBL cases in adolescents and young adults, and > 10% of cases in adults. Nonrandom retention of two copies of chromosomes from the following: the sex chromosomes plus chromosomes 1,6, 8, 10, 14, 18, and19. Chromosome 21 is almost always retained in two copies.
The most common targets of aneuploidy are chromosomes 2–4, 7, 9, 12–13, 15–17 and 20[14]. |
| High-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL with hypodiploidy (40–43 chromosomes) | Genetic alterations involve CDKN2A and TP53[18]. | Rare, occurring in approximately 4% of diagnosed cases of hypodiploidy in both children and adults, but with a predominance of the younger group[12][21]. | P: Associated with poor prognosis. EFS 75%[3]. | No (NCCN) | Chromosome abnormalities include whole chromosome loss, specifically one sex chromosome and often chromosomes 7, 9, and/or 13. Also detected are structural anomalies especially dicentric chromosomes involving chromosomes 7, 9 or 12. |
Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)
Holmfeldt et al sequenced 124 cases of low-hypodiploid B-ALL and showed that more than two-thirds (70.6%) of near-haploid ALL cases harbored genetic alterations known or predicted to result in activation of RTK or Ras signaling, including deletion, amplification and/or sequence mutation of NF1, NRAS, KRAS, MAPK1, FLT3 or PTPN11[10].
| Gene | Genetic Alteration | Tumor Suppressor Gene, Oncogene, Other | Prevalence -
Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) |
Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP53 |
The majority are missense mutations located in exon 7, exon 8, exon 6, and exon 5. Less frequent frameshift mutations in exon 4 and 7 have been described[13]. In general are predicted to be loss of function (LOF) mutations. | Tumor supressor gene | Common (>90%) | No established significance | No (NCCN) | These alterations correlate with low-hypodiploid ALL (32–39 chromosomes) and poorer clinical outcomes[10]. Approximately 50% of children with low-hypodiploid B-ALL/LBL carry germline TP53 variants associated with Li–Fraumeni syndrome. Accordingly, genetic counseling is recommended for children with low-hypodiploid B-ALL carrying TP53 mutations, and their relatives[22]. In contrast to childhood cases, TP53 mutations in low-hypodiploid adult B-ALL are somatic, are not found in healthy hematopoietic cells, and not detectable in remission samples[10][13]. |
| RB1 | Focal deletion and mutation[10][23] | Tumor supressor gene | Common | No established significance | No (NCCN) | Associated with low-hypodiploid B-ALL. |
| NF1 | Mutations and focal deletions. In 68% of the cases, the NF1 deletions were intragenic involving exons 15 through 35. Because of aneuploidy, the NF1 alterations were biallelic in 76.7% of near-haploid cases.[10] | Tumor supressor gene | Mutations: Recurrent
Focal deletions: Common[10] |
No established significance | No (NCCN) | Involved in RTK/RAS cellular pathway, and associated primarily with near-haploid B-ALL[10][23]. |
| FLT3 | Mutation[10] | Oncogene | Recurrent | No established significance | No (NCCN) | |
| NRAS | Mutation[10] | Oncogene | Recurrent | No established significance | No (NCCN) | |
| KRAS | Mutation[10] | Oncogene | Rare | No established significance | No (NCCN) | |
| MAPK1 | Mutation[10] | Oncogene | Rare | No established significance | No (NCCN) | |
| PTPN11 | Mutation[10] | Oncoogene | Rare | No established significance | No (NCCN) | |
| CDKN2A/B | Focal deletion[10] | Tumor supressor | Common | No established significance | No (NCCN) | Associated with near-haploid B-ALL and low-hypodiploid B-ALL. |
| IKZF2 | Focal deletion. Alterations of IKZF2 and IKZF3 were biallelic as a result of aneuploidy[10]. | Tumor supressor | Common | No established significance | No (NCCN) | Associated with low-hypodiploid B-ALL. |
| IKZF3
|
Focal deletion and one frameshift mutation[10] | Tumor supressor | Recurrent | No established significance | No (NCCN) | Associated with near-haploid B-ALL. |
| PAG1 | Focal deletion[10]. Most PAG1 deletions were homozygous and involved the upstream region and first exon, leading to a complete loss of PAG1 expression. | Tumor supressor | Recurrent | No established significance | No (NCCN) | Associated with near-haploid B-ALL. It was identified as a putative RAS signaling inhibitor and have a negative regulatory function in proximal B-cell receptor signaling[10]. |
Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal, COSMIC, and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.
Epigenomic Alterations
In near haploid 19% of the cases had focal deletions of histone gene cluster at 6p22, however, non-hypodiploid ALL had 8%, lower frequency of these deletions[10]. Of the 25 next generation sequenced haploid cases 16 (64%) cases had twenty six histone modifier gene mutations and of the 15 low hypodiploid ALL cases 9 (60%) cases had 9 mutations; the most common mutation (32%) of the near haploid cases was transcriptional co-activator and histone acetyltransferase CREBBP[10].
Genes and Main Pathways Involved
| Gene; Genetic Alteration | Pathway | Pathophysiologic Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| NF1, NRAS, KRAS, MAPK1, FLT3 or PTPN11; Activating mutations[10] | RTK or Ras signaling | Constitutive activation of mitogenic and anti-apoptotic pathways, driving uncontrolled cell proliferation, survival, and malignant transformation. |
| CDKN2A/B, TP53, RB1; Loss of function mutations[10] | Cell cycle and apoptosis | Propagation of genetically altered cells. |
| IKZF1, IKZF2, IKZF3, PAX5, EBF1, VPREB1[23] | B-cell development | Altered lymphoid development and differentiation. |
| PAG1[23] | BCR signaling | Altered regulatory function in proximal B cell–receptor signaling. |
| ETV6[23] | Hematopoiesis | Not fully elucidated in this entity |
| ARPP21[23] | Calmodulin signaling | Not fully elucidated in this entity |
| SLX4IP[23] | Telomere length maintenance | Not fully elucidated in this entity |
| CUL5[23] | Ubiquitin pathway | Not fully elucidated in this entity |
| FAM53B[23] | Wnt signaling | Not fully elucidated in this entity |
| PDS5B[23] | Cohesis complex | Not fully elucidated in this entity |
| ANKRD11, DMD[23] | Cell adhesion | Not fully elucidated in this entity |
Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods
Karyotype, flow cytometry DNA index, FISH, and SNP arrays are all useful in establishing the diagnosis[1]. When using FISH or karyotype, approximately 16% to 30% of the ALL cases yield no or inadequate cytogenetic results due to inadequate specimens and absent or few mitotic cells. Among those with a cytogenetic result, 15% to 25% have a normal karyotype[24]. High-resolution SNP array can detect IKZF1 deletions and other cryptic copy number aberrations as well as CN-LOH that are not detectable by chromosome analysis[25].
Familial Forms
In Low hypodiploid (LH), several studies have not only identified a high percentage of pediatric patients with TP53 mutations, but close to half displayed germline mutations, suggesting that LH ALL is a manifestation of Li-Fraumeni syndrome in children[10][19][22].
Adults also showed a high incidence of TP53 mutations, but these mutations appear to be somatic in origin. In NH, mutations of genes of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathway, Ras signaling, IKZF3 (17q21.1) and histone clusters, but mutations of IZFK2, RB1, or TP53 were rare.
Additional Information
Genetic abnormalities involving TP53, RB1 and IKZF2 are hallmarks of low hypodiploid ALL, where as near haploid ALL has RTK, RAS and IKZF3 alterations[10].
Links
N/A
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 WHO Classification of Tumours: Haematolymphoid Tumours [Internet; Beta Version Ahead of Print](5th ed.), International Agency for Research on Cancer (2022)
- ↑ Harrison, Christine J.; et al. (2004). "Three distinct subgroups of hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia". British Journal of Haematology. 125 (5): 552–559. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04948.x. ISSN 0007-1048. PMID 15147369.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Pui, Ching-Hon; et al. (2019-04-01). "Outcome of Children With Hypodiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Multinational Study". Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 37 (10): 770–779. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.00822. ISSN 1527-7755. PMC 7051863 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 30657737. - ↑ 4.0 4.1 Nachman, James B.; et al. (2007). "Outcome of treatment in children with hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Blood. 110 (4): 1112–1115. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-07-038299. ISSN 0006-4971. PMC 1939895. PMID 17473063.
- ↑ Safavi, S.; et al. (2013). "Loss of chromosomes is the primary event in near-haploid and low-hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Leukemia. 27 (1): 248–250. doi:10.1038/leu.2012.227. ISSN 1476-5551. PMID 22889820.
- ↑ Harrison, Christine J.; et al. (2005-05). "Interphase molecular cytogenetic screening for chromosomal abnormalities of prognostic significance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a UK Cancer Cytogenetics Group Study". British Journal of Haematology. 129 (4): 520–530. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05497.x. ISSN 0007-1048. PMID 15877734. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ Raimondi, Susana C.; et al. (2003-12-15). "Reassessment of the prognostic significance of hypodiploidy in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Cancer. 98 (12): 2715–2722. doi:10.1002/cncr.11841. ISSN 0008-543X. PMID 14669294.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Panuciak, Kinga; et al. (2023-05-15). "Overview on Aneuploidy in Childhood B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24 (10): 8764. doi:10.3390/ijms24108764. ISSN 1422-0067. PMC 10218510 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 37240110 Check|pmid=value (help). - ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Safavi, Setareh; et al. (2017). "Near-haploid and low-hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia: two distinct subtypes with consistently poor prognosis". Blood. 129 (4): 420–423. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-10-743765. ISSN 1528-0020. PMID 27903530.
- ↑ 10.00 10.01 10.02 10.03 10.04 10.05 10.06 10.07 10.08 10.09 10.10 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 10.19 10.20 10.21 10.22 10.23 Holmfeldt, Linda; et al. (2013). "The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Nature Genetics. 45 (3): 242–252. doi:10.1038/ng.2532. ISSN 1546-1718. PMC 3919793. PMID 23334668.
- ↑ Creasey, Thomas; et al. (2021-09). "Single nucleotide polymorphism array-based signature of low hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer. 60 (9): 604–615. doi:10.1002/gcc.22956. ISSN 1098-2264. PMC 8600946 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 33938069 Check|pmid=value (help). Check date values in:|date=(help) - ↑ 12.0 12.1 Harrison, Christine J.; et al. (2004-06). "Three distinct subgroups of hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia". British Journal of Haematology. 125 (5): 552–559. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04948.x. ISSN 0007-1048. PMID 15147369. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 Mühlbacher, Verena; et al. (2014). "Acute lymphoblastic leukemia with low hypodiploid/near triploid karyotype is a specific clinical entity and exhibits a very high TP53 mutation frequency of 93%". Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer. 53 (6): 524–536. doi:10.1002/gcc.22163. ISSN 1098-2264. PMID 24619868.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 Holmfeldt, Linda; et al. (2013-03). "The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Nature Genetics. 45 (3): 242–252. doi:10.1038/ng.2532. ISSN 1546-1718. PMC 3919793. PMID 23334668. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ Carroll, Andrew J.; et al. (2019-10). "Masked hypodiploidy: Hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) mimicking hyperdiploid ALL in children: A report from the Children's Oncology Group". Cancer Genetics. 238: 62–68. doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.07.009. ISSN 2210-7762. PMC 6768693. PMID 31425927. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ Creasey, Thomas; et al. (2021-09). "Single nucleotide polymorphism array-based signature of low hypodiploidy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer. 60 (9): 604–615. doi:10.1002/gcc.22956. ISSN 1098-2264. PMC 8600946 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 33938069 Check|pmid=value (help). Check date values in:|date=(help) - ↑ Yu, Chih-Hsiang; et al. (2020-07-13). "MLPA and DNA index improve the molecular diagnosis of childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 11501. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68311-9. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 7359332 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 32661308 Check|pmid=value (help). - ↑ 18.0 18.1 Safavi, Setareh; et al. (2015). "Genetic and epigenetic characterization of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Oncotarget. 6 (40): 42793–42802. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6000. ISSN 1949-2553. PMC 4767471. PMID 26544893.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Stengel, Anna; et al. (2014-07-10). "TP53 mutations occur in 15.7% of ALL and are associated with MYC-rearrangement, low hypodiploidy, and a poor prognosis". Blood. 124 (2): 251–258. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-02-558833. ISSN 1528-0020. PMID 24829203.
- ↑ Vogelstein, B.; et al. (2000-11-16). "Surfing the p53 network". Nature. 408 (6810): 307–310. doi:10.1038/35042675. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11099028.
- ↑ Moorman, Anthony V. (2016). "New and emerging prognostic and predictive genetic biomarkers in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia". Haematologica. 101 (4): 407–416. doi:10.3324/haematol.2015.141101. ISSN 1592-8721. PMC 5004393. PMID 27033238.
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Comeaux, Evan Q.; et al. (2017-03-01). "TP53 Mutations in Hypodiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 7 (3): a026286. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a026286. ISSN 2157-1422. PMC 5334249. PMID 28003275.
- ↑ 23.00 23.01 23.02 23.03 23.04 23.05 23.06 23.07 23.08 23.09 23.10 Molina, Oscar; et al. (2021-12-22). "Near-Haploidy and Low-Hypodiploidy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: When Less Is Too Much". Cancers. 14 (1): 32. doi:10.3390/cancers14010032. ISSN 2072-6694. PMC 8750410 Check
|pmc=value (help). PMID 35008193 Check|pmid=value (help). - ↑ Moorman, Anthony V.; et al. (2010-05). "Prognostic effect of chromosomal abnormalities in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the UK Medical Research Council ALL97/99 randomised trial". The Lancet. Oncology. 11 (5): 429–438. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70066-8. ISSN 1474-5488. PMID 20409752. Check date values in:
|date=(help) - ↑ Wang, Yunhong; et al. (2016). "Genome-Wide Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Analysis Improves Prognostication of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma". The Journal of molecular diagnostics: JMD. 18 (4): 595–603. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.03.004. ISSN 1943-7811. PMID 27161658.
Notes
*Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page. If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the CCGA coordinators (contact information provided on the homepage). Additional global feedback or concerns are also welcome.
[[Copy Number and cn-LOH Abnormalities in ALL]
*Citation of this Page: “B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with hypodiploidy”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated 11/21/2025, https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:B-lymphoblastic_leukaemia/lymphoma_with_hypodiploidy.