HAEM5:ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Difference between revisions

[pending revision][pending revision]
Line 60: Line 60:
|-
|-
|'''Laboratory Findings'''
|'''Laboratory Findings'''
|Not relevant
|Not specific
|}
|}


Line 157: Line 157:
|Yes
|Yes
|No
|No
|<nowiki>*</nowiki> These rearrangements are considered mutually exclusive; however, a single case with both ''DUSP22'' and ''TP63'' rearrangement has been described<ref name=":11" />. Can also be seen in a fraction of other PTCL.
|
* <nowiki>*</nowiki> These rearrangements are considered mutually exclusive; however, a single case with both ''DUSP22'' and ''TP63'' rearrangement has been described<ref name=":11" />. Can also be seen in a fraction of other PTCL.
* 5-year overall survival > 90%
* '''Therapeutic Implications'''
**Multi-agent chemotherapy (CHOEP or CHOP-based) as first-line, with or without radiotherapy of involved site
**High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for remission
**DUSP22 subtype may not gain additional benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission
**Theoretical:
***Ruxolitinib may be used to target JAK-STAT pathway<ref name=":13" /><ref name=":3" /> (not FDA-approved)
***Bromodomain and extra-terminal proteins (BET) inhibitors may target ERBB4 pathway<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":14" />
|-
|-
|*t(3;3)(q22;q26.2), inv(3)(q26q28)
|*t(3;3)(q22;q26.2), inv(3)(q26q28)
Line 166: Line 175:
|Yes
|Yes
|No
|No
|See t(6;7) notes
|
* *See t(6;7) notes
* 5-year overall survival > 17%
|-
|-
|t(10;19)(q24;p13)
|t(10;19)(q24;p13)
Line 176: Line 187:
|No
|No
|
|
* 5-year overall survival 42% for cases lacking all DUSP22, TP63 and ALK rearrangements<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":15" />
|-
|-
|t(1;19)(p34;p13)
|t(1;19)(p34;p13)
Line 237: Line 249:
**When compared to ALK(+) ALCL, ALK(-) ALCL has a generally poorer prognosis, however:
**When compared to ALK(+) ALCL, ALK(-) ALCL has a generally poorer prognosis, however:
***When stratified for age, prognosis between ALK(-) and ALK(+) ALCL appears similar <ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=Kj|first=Savage|last2=Nl|first2=Harris|last3=Jm|first3=Vose|last4=F|first4=Ullrich|last5=Es|first5=Jaffe|last6=Jm|first6=Connors|last7=L|first7=Rimsza|last8=Sa|first8=Pileri|last9=M|first9=Chhanabhai|date=2008|title=ALK- anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is clinically and immunophenotypically different from both ALK+ ALCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: report from the International Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Project|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18385450/|language=en|pmid=18385450}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=D|first=Sibon|last2=M|first2=Fournier|last3=J|first3=Brière|last4=L|first4=Lamant|last5=C|first5=Haioun|last6=B|first6=Coiffier|last7=S|first7=Bologna|last8=P|first8=Morel|last9=J|first9=Gabarre|date=2012|title=Long-term outcome of adults with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma treated within the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte trials|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23045585/|language=en|pmid=23045585}}</ref>
***When stratified for age, prognosis between ALK(-) and ALK(+) ALCL appears similar <ref name=":8">{{Cite journal|last=Kj|first=Savage|last2=Nl|first2=Harris|last3=Jm|first3=Vose|last4=F|first4=Ullrich|last5=Es|first5=Jaffe|last6=Jm|first6=Connors|last7=L|first7=Rimsza|last8=Sa|first8=Pileri|last9=M|first9=Chhanabhai|date=2008|title=ALK- anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is clinically and immunophenotypically different from both ALK+ ALCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: report from the International Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Project|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18385450/|language=en|pmid=18385450}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=D|first=Sibon|last2=M|first2=Fournier|last3=J|first3=Brière|last4=L|first4=Lamant|last5=C|first5=Haioun|last6=B|first6=Coiffier|last7=S|first7=Bologna|last8=P|first8=Morel|last9=J|first9=Gabarre|date=2012|title=Long-term outcome of adults with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma treated within the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte trials|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23045585/|language=en|pmid=23045585}}</ref>
**5-year overall survival > 90% for DUSP22-rearranged ALK(-) ALCL, 17% for TP63-rearranged ALK(-) ALCL, and 42% for cases lacking all DUSP22, TP63 and ALK rearrangements<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Mb|first=Pedersen|last2=Sj|first2=Hamilton-Dutoit|last3=K|first3=Bendix|last4=Rp|first4=Ketterling|last5=Pp|first5=Bedroske|last6=Im|first6=Luoma|last7=Ca|first7=Sattler|last8=Rl|first8=Boddicker|last9=Nn|first9=Bennani|date=2017|title=DUSP22 and TP63 rearrangements predict outcome of ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a Danish cohort study|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28522440/|language=en|doi=10.1182/blood-2016-12-755496|pmc=PMC5533203|pmid=28522440}}</ref>
**5-year overall survival > 90% for DUSP22-rearranged ALK(-) ALCL, 17% for TP63-rearranged ALK(-) ALCL, and 42% for cases lacking all DUSP22, TP63 and ALK rearrangements<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":15">{{Cite journal|last=Mb|first=Pedersen|last2=Sj|first2=Hamilton-Dutoit|last3=K|first3=Bendix|last4=Rp|first4=Ketterling|last5=Pp|first5=Bedroske|last6=Im|first6=Luoma|last7=Ca|first7=Sattler|last8=Rl|first8=Boddicker|last9=Nn|first9=Bennani|date=2017|title=DUSP22 and TP63 rearrangements predict outcome of ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a Danish cohort study|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28522440/|language=en|doi=10.1182/blood-2016-12-755496|pmc=PMC5533203|pmid=28522440}}</ref>
**Patients with 6q21/PRDM1 and/or 17p loss showed an inferior outcome than patients with normal 6q21 and 17p; not clear if mainly due to [[TP53]] deletion due to study size<ref name=":5" />
**Patients with 6q21/PRDM1 and/or 17p loss showed an inferior outcome than patients with normal 6q21 and 17p; not clear if mainly due to [[TP53]] deletion due to study size<ref name=":5" />
***Often concomitant loss and seen in almost a quarter of cases
***Often concomitant loss and seen in almost a quarter of cases
Line 249: Line 261:
**DUSP22 subtype may not gain additional benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission
**DUSP22 subtype may not gain additional benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission
**Theoretical:
**Theoretical:
***Ruxolitinib may be used to target JAK-STAT pathway<ref>{{Cite journal|last=R|first=Roskoski|date=2016|title=Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory and neoplastic diseases|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27473820/|language=en|pmid=27473820}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=E|first=Mereu|last2=E|first2=Pellegrino|last3=I|first3=Scarfò|last4=G|first4=Inghirami|last5=R|first5=Piva|date=2017|title=The heterogeneous landscape of ALK negative ALCL|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28061468/|language=en|doi=10.18632/oncotarget.14503|pmc=PMC5392347|pmid=28061468}}</ref> (not FDA-approved)
***Ruxolitinib may be used to target JAK-STAT pathway<ref name=":13">{{Cite journal|last=R|first=Roskoski|date=2016|title=Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory and neoplastic diseases|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27473820/|language=en|pmid=27473820}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=E|first=Mereu|last2=E|first2=Pellegrino|last3=I|first3=Scarfò|last4=G|first4=Inghirami|last5=R|first5=Piva|date=2017|title=The heterogeneous landscape of ALK negative ALCL|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28061468/|language=en|doi=10.18632/oncotarget.14503|pmc=PMC5392347|pmid=28061468}}</ref> (not FDA-approved)
***Bromodomain and extra-terminal proteins (BET) inhibitors may target ERBB4 pathway<ref name=":3" /><ref>{{Cite journal|last=A|first=Chaidos|last2=V|first2=Caputo|last3=A|first3=Karadimitris|date=2015|title=Inhibition of bromodomain and extra-terminal proteins (BET) as a potential therapeutic approach in haematological malignancies: emerging preclinical and clinical evidence|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26137204/|language=en|doi=10.1177/2040620715576662|pmc=PMC4480520|pmid=26137204}}</ref>
***Bromodomain and extra-terminal proteins (BET) inhibitors may target ERBB4 pathway<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":14">{{Cite journal|last=A|first=Chaidos|last2=V|first2=Caputo|last3=A|first3=Karadimitris|date=2015|title=Inhibition of bromodomain and extra-terminal proteins (BET) as a potential therapeutic approach in haematological malignancies: emerging preclinical and clinical evidence|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26137204/|language=en|doi=10.1177/2040620715576662|pmc=PMC4480520|pmid=26137204}}</ref>


</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Line 265: Line 277:
!Notes
!Notes
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE
|1q
 
|Gain
7
|
|EXAMPLE Loss
|
|EXAMPLE
|No
 
|No
chr7:1- 159,335,973 [hg38]
|EXAMPLE
 
chr7
|Yes
|Yes
|No
|No
|EXAMPLE
|Prevalence 30%
 
Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference).  Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference).
|-
|-
|EXAMPLE
|
 
8
|EXAMPLE Gain
|EXAMPLE Gain
|EXAMPLE
|EXAMPLE