HAEM5:Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma: Difference between revisions
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
Fnu.Monika (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Fnu.Monika (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*'''EATL accounts for 3% of peripheral T-cell lymphomas and 66% of all primary intestinal T-cell lymphomas reported in Europe and the USA''' | *'''EATL accounts for 3% of peripheral T-cell lymphomas and 66% of all primary intestinal T-cell lymphomas reported in Europe and the USA''' | ||
*'''Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is an aggressive intestinal T-cell lymphoma more common in patients with celiac disease'''<ref name=":5">Govind Bhagat, et al. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Haematolymphoid tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024 [cited 2024 July 2]. (WHO classification of tumors series, 5th ed.; vol. 11). Available from: <nowiki>https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chaptercontent/63/224</nowiki> </ref> | *'''Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) is an aggressive intestinal T-cell lymphoma more common in patients with celiac disease, especially type II refractory celiac disease (RCDII).''' <ref name=":5">Govind Bhagat, et al. Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Haematolymphoid tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024 [cited 2024 July 2]. (WHO classification of tumors series, 5th ed.; vol. 11). Available from: <nowiki>https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chaptercontent/63/224</nowiki> </ref> | ||
*Celiac disease may be diagnosed prior to EATL diagnosis in 20-73% of cases, or both entities may be diagnosed concomitantly in 10-58% of the cases<ref name=":5" /> | *Celiac disease may be diagnosed prior to EATL diagnosis in 20-73% of cases, or both entities may be diagnosed concomitantly in 10-58% of the cases<ref name=":5" /> | ||
*Risk factors include homozygosity for HLA-DQ2 and advanced age<ref name=":5" /> | *Risk factors include homozygosity for HLA-DQ2 and advanced age<ref name=":5" /> | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
*Hemophagocytosis | *Hemophagocytosis | ||
|} | |} | ||
If there is no prior diagnosis of celiac disease and lymphoma is the initial presentation, the following findings can point towards celiac disease associated EATL: | |||
* Anti-tissue transglutaminase-2 antibodies or Anti-endomysial antibodies | |||
* Dermatitis herpetiformis | |||
| Line 115: | Line 120: | ||
cytotoxic granule-associated markers (TIA1, granzyme B, perforin) | cytotoxic granule-associated markers (TIA1, granzyme B, perforin) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Negative (frequent)||CD4, CD8, CD5, CD56, TCR | |Negative (frequent)||CD4, CD8, CD5, CD56, TCR, EBER | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ki-67||high | |Ki-67||high | ||
|} | |} | ||
Immunophenotype of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL):<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":0" /> | |||
*Varies depending on background type 1 or type 2 refractory celiac disease (RCD). | |||
**Type 1 (RCD1): | |||
***Milder symptoms with high 5-year survival with low risk of EATL development | |||
***Flow cytometry: sCD3+, CD8+, CD5+ | |||
**Type 2 (RCD2): | |||
***Severe symptoms with protein-losing enteropathy leads to malnourishment (BMI < 18); low 5-year survival with increased risk of EATL | |||
***Flow cytometry: sCD3<sup>_</sup>, CD8-, CD5- | |||
***IHC: | |||
****NKP46: significantly more positive in RCD2 IEL than normal IEL in CD and RCD1; not specific for RCD2 or EATL, can be seen in [[HAEM5:Monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma|MEITL]]; not seen in [[HAEM5:Indolent T-cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract|indolent T-cell LPD of GI tract]] | |||
****CD30+ indicates progression to EATL | |||
| Line 215: | Line 233: | ||
!Notes | !Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9 | |||
|gain | |||
|9q | |9q | ||
| | |q22-34 | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|EXAMPLE | |EXAMPLE | ||
Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference). | Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference). | ||
|- | |- | ||
|16 | |||
|loss | |||
|16q | |16q | ||
| | |12.1 | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|EXAMPLE | |EXAMPLE | ||
Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference). | Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference). | ||
|- | |- | ||
|1 | |||
|gain | |||
|1q | |1q | ||
| | |q22-44 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 254: | Line 264: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 | |||
|gain | |||
|5q | |5q | ||
| | |q33.3–34 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 263: | Line 273: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9 | |||
|LOH | |||
|9p | |9p | ||
| | |p21 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 272: | Line 282: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7 | |||
|gain | |||
|7q | |7q | ||
| | |q11.21-q36.1 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 281: | Line 291: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8 | |||
|loss | |||
|8p | |8p | ||
| | |p23.3-p11.21 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 290: | Line 300: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8 | |||
|gain | |||
|8q | |8q | ||
| | |q24 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 299: | Line 309: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|13 | |||
|loss | |||
|13q | |13q | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 308: | Line 318: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|17 | |||
|loss | |||
|17p | |17p | ||
| | |p12-13.2 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||