HAEM5:B-lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma with iAMP21: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
==Gene Rearrangements== | ==Gene Rearrangements== | ||
Some rearrangements have been seen as secondary abnormalities. | Some rearrangements have been seen as secondary abnormalities. | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | !Driver Gene!!Fusion(s) and Common Partner Genes!!Molecular Pathogenesis!!Typical Chromosomal Alteration(s) | ||
! | !Prevalence -Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) | ||
!Prognostic Significance | !Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | ||
! | !Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | ||
!Notes | !Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |''CRLF2'' | ||
|''P2RY8::CRLF2'' | |||
| | | | ||
|del(X)(p22.33p22.33)/del(Y)(p11.32p11.32) | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|Because of the unique nature of the iAMP21 abnormality, cases that present with additional genomic lesions that may suggest another category, such as a CRLF2 rearrangement, should still be classified as B-ALL with iAMP21. | | | ||
| rowspan="3" |Because of the unique nature of the iAMP21 abnormality, cases that present with additional genomic lesions that may suggest another category, such as a ''CRLF2'' rearrangement, should still be classified as B-ALL with iAMP21. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Chimeric transcription factor/fusion gene | |||
|''ETV6::RUNX1'' | |||
|The driver gene is a result of the fusion of 5'<nowiki/>''ETV6'' and 3'''RUNX1,'' genes that regulate hematopoiesis, which creates a chimeric transcription factor. | |||
|t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1) | |t(12;21)(p13.2;q22.1) | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |||
|''ABL'' | |||
|''BCR::ABL1'' | |||
|The pathogenic derivative is the der(22) resulting in fusion of 5’ ''BCR'' and 3’''ABL1''. | |||
|t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
==Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH== | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
|- | |||
!Chr #!!Gain, Loss, Amp, LOH!!Minimal Region Cytoband and/or Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build; Size]!!Relevant Gene(s) | |||
!Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | |||
!Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | |||
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | |||
|- | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>7 | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Loss | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>chr7 | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>Unknown | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> No | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference). Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add references). | |||
|- | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>8 | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Gain | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>chr8 | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>Unknown | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P | |||
| | | | ||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add references). | |||
|- | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>17 | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Amp | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>17q12; chr17:39,700,064-39,728,658 [hg38; 28.6 kb] | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>''ERBB2'' | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P, T | |||
| | | | ||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>Amplification of ''ERBB2'' is associated with HER2 overexpression in HER2 positive breast cancer (add references). Add criteria for how amplification is defined. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 75: | Line 111: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |||
|}Cytogenetic morphology of the abnormal chromosome 21 can vary markedly between patients.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Harewood|first=L.|last2=Robinson|first2=H.|last3=Harris|first3=R.|last4=Al-Obaidi|first4=M. Jabbar|last5=Jalali|first5=G. R.|last6=Martineau|first6=M.|last7=Moorman|first7=A. V.|last8=Sumption|first8=N.|last9=Richards|first9=S.|date=2003-03|title=Amplification of AML1 on a duplicated chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study of 20 cases|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12646943|journal=Leukemia|volume=17|issue=3|pages=547–553|doi=10.1038/sj.leu.2402849|issn=0887-6924|pmid=12646943}}</ref> In ~80% of iAMP21 B-ALL cases, recurrent secondary abnormalities, both chromosomal and molecular, have been documented. Deletions involving particular genes such as; ''IKZF1, CDKN2A/B, PAX5, SH2B3, ETV6'' and ''RB1'' have also been observed.[[File:IAMP21 met.jpg|center|thumb|875x875px|iAMP21 in a ring formation; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab]] | |||
Cytogenetic morphology of the abnormal chromosome 21 can vary markedly between patients.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal|last=Harewood|first=L.|last2=Robinson|first2=H.|last3=Harris|first3=R.|last4=Al-Obaidi|first4=M. Jabbar|last5=Jalali|first5=G. R.|last6=Martineau|first6=M.|last7=Moorman|first7=A. V.|last8=Sumption|first8=N.|last9=Richards|first9=S.|date=2003-03|title=Amplification of AML1 on a duplicated chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study of 20 cases|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12646943|journal=Leukemia|volume=17|issue=3|pages=547–553|doi=10.1038/sj.leu.2402849|issn=0887-6924|pmid=12646943}}</ref> | |||
In ~80% of iAMP21 B-ALL cases, recurrent secondary abnormalities, both chromosomal and molecular, have been documented. Deletions involving particular genes such as; ''IKZF1, CDKN2A/B, PAX5, SH2B3, ETV6'' and ''RB1'' have also been observed. | |||
==Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns== | ==Characteristic Chromosomal or Other Global Mutational Patterns== | ||
| Line 91: | Line 119: | ||
iAMP21 cases have a characteristic pattern that is both complex and variable. This pattern comprises multiple regions of gain, amplification and deletion. Interestingly, ''RUNX1'' amplification is not always intrachromosomal.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Arber|first=Daniel A.|date=04 2019|title=The 2016 WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia: What the practicing clinician needs to know|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30926096|journal=Seminars in Hematology|volume=56|issue=2|pages=90–95|doi=10.1053/j.seminhematol.2018.08.002|issn=1532-8686|pmid=30926096}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Ryan C.|last2=Weinberg|first2=Olga K.|last3=Cascio|first3=Michael J.|last4=Dahl|first4=Gary V.|last5=Mitton|first5=Bryan A.|last6=Silverman|first6=Lewis B.|last7=Cherry|first7=Athena M.|last8=Arber|first8=Daniel A.|last9=Ohgami|first9=Robert S.|date=2015-07|title=Cytogenetic Variation of B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Intrachromosomal Amplification of Chromosome 21 (iAMP21): A Multi-Institutional Series Review|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26071468|journal=American Journal of Clinical Pathology|volume=144|issue=1|pages=103–112|doi=10.1309/AJCPLUYF11HQBYRB|issn=1943-7722|pmid=26071468}}</ref> The formation of iAMP21 is considered to be due to breakage-fusion-bridge cycles followed by chromothripsis and other complex structural rearrangements of chromosome 21. Studies, molecular and cytogenetic, have elucidated a common 5.1 Mb region that includes the ''RUNX1'' gene. However, even though ''RUNX1'' is included in the amplified region, there has not yet been any conclusive evidence that ''RUNX1'' is critical in the pathogenesis of disease given that it is not overexpressed in some individuals with this abnormality.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Akkari|first=Yassmine M. N.|last2=Bruyere|first2=Helene|last3=Hagelstrom|first3=R. Tanner|last4=Kanagal-Shamanna|first4=Rashmi|last5=Liu|first5=Jie|last6=Luo|first6=Minjie|last7=Mikhail|first7=Fady M.|last8=Pitel|first8=Beth A.|last9=Raca|first9=Gordana|date=2020-05|title=Evidence-based review of genomic aberrations in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Report from the cancer genomics consortium working group for lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32302940|journal=Cancer Genetics|volume=243|pages=52–72|doi=10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.03.001|issn=2210-7762|pmid=32302940}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Rand|first=Vikki|last2=Parker|first2=Helen|last3=Russell|first3=Lisa J.|last4=Schwab|first4=Claire|last5=Ensor|first5=Hannah|last6=Irving|first6=Julie|last7=Jones|first7=Lisa|last8=Masic|first8=Dino|last9=Minto|first9=Lynne|date=2011-06-23|title=Genomic characterization implicates iAMP21 as a likely primary genetic event in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21527530|journal=Blood|volume=117|issue=25|pages=6848–6855|doi=10.1182/blood-2011-01-329961|issn=1528-0020|pmid=21527530}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hunger|first=Stephen P.|last2=Lu|first2=Xiaomin|last3=Devidas|first3=Meenakshi|last4=Camitta|first4=Bruce M.|last5=Gaynon|first5=Paul S.|last6=Winick|first6=Naomi J.|last7=Reaman|first7=Gregory H.|last8=Carroll|first8=William L.|date=2012-05-10|title=Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22412151|journal=Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|volume=30|issue=14|pages=1663–1669|doi=10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8018|issn=1527-7755|pmc=3383113|pmid=22412151}}</ref> | iAMP21 cases have a characteristic pattern that is both complex and variable. This pattern comprises multiple regions of gain, amplification and deletion. Interestingly, ''RUNX1'' amplification is not always intrachromosomal.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Arber|first=Daniel A.|date=04 2019|title=The 2016 WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia: What the practicing clinician needs to know|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30926096|journal=Seminars in Hematology|volume=56|issue=2|pages=90–95|doi=10.1053/j.seminhematol.2018.08.002|issn=1532-8686|pmid=30926096}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Johnson|first=Ryan C.|last2=Weinberg|first2=Olga K.|last3=Cascio|first3=Michael J.|last4=Dahl|first4=Gary V.|last5=Mitton|first5=Bryan A.|last6=Silverman|first6=Lewis B.|last7=Cherry|first7=Athena M.|last8=Arber|first8=Daniel A.|last9=Ohgami|first9=Robert S.|date=2015-07|title=Cytogenetic Variation of B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Intrachromosomal Amplification of Chromosome 21 (iAMP21): A Multi-Institutional Series Review|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26071468|journal=American Journal of Clinical Pathology|volume=144|issue=1|pages=103–112|doi=10.1309/AJCPLUYF11HQBYRB|issn=1943-7722|pmid=26071468}}</ref> The formation of iAMP21 is considered to be due to breakage-fusion-bridge cycles followed by chromothripsis and other complex structural rearrangements of chromosome 21. Studies, molecular and cytogenetic, have elucidated a common 5.1 Mb region that includes the ''RUNX1'' gene. However, even though ''RUNX1'' is included in the amplified region, there has not yet been any conclusive evidence that ''RUNX1'' is critical in the pathogenesis of disease given that it is not overexpressed in some individuals with this abnormality.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Akkari|first=Yassmine M. N.|last2=Bruyere|first2=Helene|last3=Hagelstrom|first3=R. Tanner|last4=Kanagal-Shamanna|first4=Rashmi|last5=Liu|first5=Jie|last6=Luo|first6=Minjie|last7=Mikhail|first7=Fady M.|last8=Pitel|first8=Beth A.|last9=Raca|first9=Gordana|date=2020-05|title=Evidence-based review of genomic aberrations in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Report from the cancer genomics consortium working group for lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32302940|journal=Cancer Genetics|volume=243|pages=52–72|doi=10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.03.001|issn=2210-7762|pmid=32302940}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Rand|first=Vikki|last2=Parker|first2=Helen|last3=Russell|first3=Lisa J.|last4=Schwab|first4=Claire|last5=Ensor|first5=Hannah|last6=Irving|first6=Julie|last7=Jones|first7=Lisa|last8=Masic|first8=Dino|last9=Minto|first9=Lynne|date=2011-06-23|title=Genomic characterization implicates iAMP21 as a likely primary genetic event in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21527530|journal=Blood|volume=117|issue=25|pages=6848–6855|doi=10.1182/blood-2011-01-329961|issn=1528-0020|pmid=21527530}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hunger|first=Stephen P.|last2=Lu|first2=Xiaomin|last3=Devidas|first3=Meenakshi|last4=Camitta|first4=Bruce M.|last5=Gaynon|first5=Paul S.|last6=Winick|first6=Naomi J.|last7=Reaman|first7=Gregory H.|last8=Carroll|first8=William L.|date=2012-05-10|title=Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22412151|journal=Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology|volume=30|issue=14|pages=1663–1669|doi=10.1200/JCO.2011.37.8018|issn=1527-7755|pmc=3383113|pmid=22412151}}</ref> | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Chromosomal Pattern | !Chromosomal Pattern | ||
! | !Molecular Pathogenesis | ||
!Prognostic Significance | !Prevalence - | ||
! | Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) | ||
!Notes | !Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | ||
!Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | |||
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | |||
|- | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>Co-deletion of 1p and 18q | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference). | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (Oligodendroglioma) | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>Microsatellite instability - hypermutated | |||
| | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (Endometrial carcinoma) | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> P, T | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Amplification of RUNX1 | |Amplification of ''RUNX1'' | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|D | |||
| | | | ||
|See CMA image displaying the amplification of RUNX1. This is part of the critical region consistently amplified: chr21:32.8-37.9 Mb (hg19). | |See CMA image displaying the amplification of RUNX1. This is part of the critical region consistently amplified: chr21:32.8-37.9 Mb (hg19). | ||
| Line 111: | Line 155: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|} | | | ||
[[File:IAMP21 CMA .png|center|thumb|1028x1028px|Characteristic iAMP21 CMA; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab]] | |- | ||
|Gain of X chromosome | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Abnormalities of chromosomes 7 and 11 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Deletions of ''RB1'' and ''ETV6'' | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|}[[File:IAMP21 CMA .png|center|thumb|1028x1028px|Characteristic iAMP21 CMA; Courtesy of Fullerton Genetics Lab]] | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| Line 119: | Line 184: | ||
In a 2016 paper, it was shown that in the iAMP21-ALL exome, the mutations were more commonly transitions (for example: C>T) than transversions or indels.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Ryan|first=S. L.|last2=Matheson|first2=E.|last3=Grossmann|first3=V.|last4=Sinclair|first4=P.|last5=Bashton|first5=M.|last6=Schwab|first6=C.|last7=Towers|first7=W.|last8=Partington|first8=M.|last9=Elliott|first9=A.|date=09 2016|title=The role of the RAS pathway in iAMP21-ALL|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27168466|journal=Leukemia|volume=30|issue=9|pages=1824–1831|doi=10.1038/leu.2016.80|issn=1476-5551|pmc=5017527|pmid=27168466}}</ref> Frequently, mutations in the RAS signaling pathway have been observed. Interestingly, these mutations were observed to coexist in patterns ranging from 2-3 mutated genes to 2-4 mutations in the same gene in one sample. Further, the ''FLT3''-ITD was more prevalent in iAMP21-ALL.<ref name=":2" /> | In a 2016 paper, it was shown that in the iAMP21-ALL exome, the mutations were more commonly transitions (for example: C>T) than transversions or indels.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|last=Ryan|first=S. L.|last2=Matheson|first2=E.|last3=Grossmann|first3=V.|last4=Sinclair|first4=P.|last5=Bashton|first5=M.|last6=Schwab|first6=C.|last7=Towers|first7=W.|last8=Partington|first8=M.|last9=Elliott|first9=A.|date=09 2016|title=The role of the RAS pathway in iAMP21-ALL|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27168466|journal=Leukemia|volume=30|issue=9|pages=1824–1831|doi=10.1038/leu.2016.80|issn=1476-5551|pmc=5017527|pmid=27168466}}</ref> Frequently, mutations in the RAS signaling pathway have been observed. Interestingly, these mutations were observed to coexist in patterns ranging from 2-3 mutated genes to 2-4 mutations in the same gene in one sample. Further, the ''FLT3''-ITD was more prevalent in iAMP21-ALL.<ref name=":2" /> | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
|- | |||
!Gene!!Genetic Alteration!!Tumor Suppressor Gene, Oncogene, Other!!Prevalence - | |||
Common >20%, Recurrent 5-20% or Rare <5% (Disease) | |||
!Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Significance - D, P, T | |||
!Established Clinical Significance Per Guidelines - Yes or No (Source) | |||
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes | |||
|- | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>''EGFR''<br /> | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Exon 18-21 activating mutations | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Oncogene | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (lung cancer) | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> T | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Yes (NCCN) | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Exons 18, 19, and 21 mutations are targetable for therapy. Exon 20 T790M variants cause resistance to first generation TKI therapy and are targetable by second and third generation TKIs (add references). | |||
|- | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''TP53''; Variable LOF mutations<br /> | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Variable LOF mutations | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Tumor Supressor Gene | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (breast cancer) | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> P | |||
| | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> >90% are somatic; rare germline alterations associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (add reference). Denotes a poor prognosis in breast cancer. | |||
|- | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''BRAF''; Activating mutations | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Activating mutations | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Oncogene | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (melanoma) | |||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> T | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content. | |||
<br /> | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 188: | Line 294: | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br /> | |||
==Epigenomic Alterations== | ==Epigenomic Alterations== | ||
| Line 204: | Line 310: | ||
|RAS pathway<ref name=":2" /> | |RAS pathway<ref name=":2" /> | ||
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Increased cell growth and proliferation | |<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Increased cell growth and proliferation | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods== | ==Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods== | ||