HAEM5:Primary cutaneous gamma/delta T-cell lymphoma: Difference between revisions

[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 392: Line 392:
|P / T
|P / T
|No
|No
|MYC pathway involvement may contribute to the aggressive  phenotype; direct targeting not yet established.
|MYC pathway involvement may contribute to the aggressive  phenotype; direct targeting not yet established<ref name=":0" />
|-
|-
|'''MYCN'''
|'''MYCN'''
Line 400: Line 400:
|P / T
|P / T
|No
|No
|Highlights involvement of MYC‑family beyond MYC itself in  this disease.
|Highlights involvement of MYC‑family beyond MYC itself in  this disease<ref name=":0" />
|}Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in [https://www.cbioportal.org/ <u>cBioportal</u>], [https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic <u>COSMIC</u>], and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.
|}Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in [https://www.cbioportal.org/ <u>cBioportal</u>], [https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic <u>COSMIC</u>], and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.
==Epigenomic Alterations==
==Epigenomic Alterations==
Line 411: Line 411:
|-
|-
|DNMT3A (DNA methyltransferase)
|DNMT3A (DNA methyltransferase)
|Loss‑of‑function mutations or deletions → reduced de novo  DNA methylation; “epigenetic writer” defect (DNA methylation pathway)  
|Loss‑of‑function mutations or deletions → reduced de novo  DNA methylation; “epigenetic writer” defect (DNA methylation pathway)<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal|last=Zhang|first=Ping|last2=Zhang|first2=Mingzhi|date=2020-11-07|title=Epigenetic alterations and advancement of treatment in peripheral T-cell lymphoma|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33160401|journal=Clinical Epigenetics|volume=12|issue=1|pages=169|doi=10.1186/s13148-020-00962-x|issn=1868-7083|pmc=7648940|pmid=33160401}}</ref>
|Deregulation of gene silencing; tumour suppressor genes  may remain unmethylated or aberrantly methylated → genomic instability,  aberrant T‑cell differentiation/activation
|Deregulation of gene silencing; tumour suppressor genes  may remain unmethylated or aberrantly methylated → genomic instability,  aberrant T‑cell differentiation/activation
|-
|-
|TET2 (methylcytosine dioxygenase)
|TET2 (methylcytosine dioxygenase)
|Loss‑of‑function mutations → failure of DNA 5‑mC → 5‑hmC  demethylation (“epigenetic eraser” defect)  
|Loss‑of‑function mutations → failure of DNA 5‑mC → 5‑hmC  demethylation (“epigenetic eraser” defect)<ref name=":4" />
|Aberrant hypermethylation or demethylation patterns;  influences T‑cell development and malignant transformation (e.g., in T‑fh  lymphomas)
|Aberrant hypermethylation or demethylation patterns;  influences T‑cell development and malignant transformation (e.g., in T‑fh  lymphomas)
|-
|-
|IDH2 (metabolic enzyme altering epigenome)
|IDH2 (metabolic enzyme altering epigenome)
|Gain‑of‑function mutation (e.g., R172) → produces 2‑hydroxyglutarate  → inhibits TET family → epigenetic dysregulation  
|Gain‑of‑function mutation (e.g., R172) → produces 2‑hydroxyglutarate  → inhibits TET family → epigenetic dysregulation<ref name=":4" />
|Oncometabolite‑driven methylation changes, impaired  differentiation, proliferation of malignant T cells
|Oncometabolite‑driven methylation changes, impaired  differentiation, proliferation of malignant T cells
|-
|-
|ARID1A (SWI/SNF chromatin‑remodeller)
|ARID1A (SWI/SNF chromatin‑remodeller)
|Loss‑of‑function mutation/deletion → impaired nucleosome  remodelling, altered chromatin accessibility (“chromatin remodeller”)  
|Loss‑of‑function mutation/deletion → impaired nucleosome  remodelling, altered chromatin accessibility (“chromatin remodeller”)<ref name=":4" />
|Reduced tumour‑suppressor gene expression due to  chromatin compaction; may influence immune microenvironment and genomic  instability
|Reduced tumour‑suppressor gene expression due to  chromatin compaction; may influence immune microenvironment and genomic  instability
|-
|-
|KMT2D / KMT2A (H3K4 methyltransferases)
|KMT2D / KMT2A (H3K4 methyltransferases)
|Loss‑of‑function mutations (“histone‑writer” defect) →  decreased H3K4 methylation (activating mark)  
|Loss‑of‑function mutations (“histone‑writer” defect) →  decreased H3K4 methylation (activating mark)<ref name=":5">{{Cite journal|last=Ahmed|first=Nada|last2=Feldman|first2=Andrew L.|date=2020-02|title=Targeting epigenetic regulators in the treatment of T-cell lymphoma|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31903826|journal=Expert Review of Hematology|volume=13|issue=2|pages=127–139|doi=10.1080/17474086.2020.1711732|issn=1747-4094|pmc=7110907|pmid=31903826}}</ref>
|Impaired activation of gene expression programs  (differentiation, apoptosis) → contributes to malignant transformation
|Impaired activation of gene expression programs  (differentiation, apoptosis) → contributes to malignant transformation
|-
|-
|KDM6A (H3K27 demethylase)
|KDM6A (H3K27 demethylase)
|Loss‑of‑function → accumulation of H3K27me3 (repressive  histone mark) (“histone‑eraser” defect)  
|Loss‑of‑function → accumulation of H3K27me3 (repressive  histone mark) (“histone‑eraser” defect)<ref name=":5" />
|Further chromatin repression of tumour‑suppressor genes;  may enhance survival of malignant T cells
|Further chromatin repression of tumour‑suppressor genes;  may enhance survival of malignant T cells
|-
|-
|EZH2 (PRC2 complex methyltransferase)
|EZH2 (PRC2 complex methyltransferase)
|Overexpression/gain of function → increased H3K27me3  (“histone‑writer” overactivity) (PMC)
|Overexpression/gain of function → increased H3K27me3  (“histone‑writer” overactivity) <ref name=":4" />
|Enhanced silencing of differentiation/apoptosis genes;  contributes to aggressive lymphoma phenotypes
|Enhanced silencing of differentiation/apoptosis genes;  contributes to aggressive lymphoma phenotypes
|-
|-
|CREBBP / EP300 (histone acetyl‑transferases)
|CREBBP / EP300 (histone acetyl‑transferases)
|Loss‑of‑function mutations (“histone‑writer” defect) →  reduced histone acetylation and gene activation  
|Loss‑of‑function mutations (“histone‑writer” defect) →  reduced histone acetylation and gene activation<ref name=":5" />
|Diminished transcriptional activation of tumour‑suppressor/immune  genes; may drive malignant progression
|Diminished transcriptional activation of tumour‑suppressor/immune  genes; may drive malignant progression
|-
|-
|DNA methylation of specific tumour‑suppressor loci (e.g.,  CDKN2A promoter; FAS promoter)
|DNA methylation of specific tumour‑suppressor loci (e.g.,  CDKN2A promoter; FAS promoter)
|Hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands → silencing of tumor suppressor / apoptosis‑initiator genes  
|Hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands → silencing of tumor suppressor / apoptosis‑initiator genes<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hara|first=Natsumi|last2=Sawada|first2=Yu|date=2022-03-24|title=Epigenetics of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35408897|journal=International Journal of Molecular Sciences|volume=23|issue=7|pages=3538|doi=10.3390/ijms23073538|issn=1422-0067|pmc=8998216|pmid=35408897}}</ref>
|Loss of cell‑cycle control or apoptosis leads to  malignant T‑cell survival/proliferation
|Loss of cell‑cycle control or apoptosis leads to  malignant T‑cell survival/proliferation
|}
|}