GTS5:PALB2-related cancer predisposition syndrome (PALB2): Difference between revisions

Recommended testing approaches for ''PALB2'' include comprehensive germline sequencing with concurrent copy number analysis. Next generation sequencing (NGS) based multigene hereditary cancer panels or targeted PALB2 sequencing are the primary diagnostic methods to identify clinically significant variants, including pathogenic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions (indels), and canonical splice-site alterations<ref name=":14">Antoniou AC, et al. Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(6):497–506.</ref><ref name=":15">Tischkowitz M, et al. Management of PALB2-associated breast cancer risk. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(2):e75–e86</ref>. Because exonic and whole gene deletions or duplications represent a clinically relevant subset of pathogenic ''PALB2'' variants, copy number variant (CNV) analysis should be performed as part of routine testing. CNV detection may be achieved using NGS read-depth algorithms, multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA), or chromosomal microarray (CMA) when appropriate<ref name=":16">lavin TP, et al. The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017;3:22.</ref><ref name=":17">National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic. Version 2024</ref>. For individuals with a strong personal or family history suggestive of hereditary breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer and negative standard testing, RNA analysis may be considered to clarify the functional impact of suspected splice-altering variants or deep intronic changes <ref name=":18">Southey MC, et al. PALB2 splice variants and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18:14.</ref>. When ''PALB2'' variants are identified through tumor only genomic testing, paired germline testing is recommended to distinguish germline pathogenic variants from somatic alterations and to inform clinical management, cascade testing, and cancer risk assessment for at-risk relatives<ref name=":19">Richards S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424</ref><ref name=":17" />.