HAEM5:Systemic chronic active EBV disease: Difference between revisions

[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
No edit summary
Line 44: Line 44:


==Gene Rearrangements==
==Gene Rearrangements==
Put your text here and fill in the table <span style="color:#0070C0">(''Instructions: Details on clinical significance such as prognosis and other important information can be provided in the notes section. Please include references throughout the table. Do not delete the table.'')</span>
Approximately half of CAEBV cases show monoclonal T-cell gene rearrangements.
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
Line 53: Line 53:
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
!Clinical Relevance Details/Other Notes
|-
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''ABL1''||<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''BCR::ABL1''||<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> The pathogenic derivative is the der(22) resulting in fusion of 5’ BCR and 3’ABL1.||<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)
|T-cell Receptor (TCR) Gene Rearrangements||N/A||V(D)J rearrangement of T-cell receptor loci <ref>{{Cite journal|last=van Dongen|first=J. J. M.|last2=Langerak|first2=A. W.|last3=Brüggemann|first3=M.|last4=Evans|first4=P. a. S.|last5=Hummel|first5=M.|last6=Lavender|first6=F. L.|last7=Delabesse|first7=E.|last8=Davi|first8=F.|last9=Schuuring|first9=E.|date=2003-12|title=Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14671650|journal=Leukemia|volume=17|issue=12|pages=2257–2317|doi=10.1038/sj.leu.2403202|issn=0887-6924|pmid=14671650}}</ref>||N/A
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (CML)
|Monoclonality detected in ~47% of cases<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kimura|first=Hiroshi|last2=Ito|first2=Yoshinori|last3=Kawabe|first3=Shinji|last4=Gotoh|first4=Kensei|last5=Takahashi|first5=Yoshiyuki|last6=Kojima|first6=Seiji|last7=Naoe|first7=Tomoki|last8=Esaki|first8=Shinichi|last9=Kikuta|first9=Atsushi|date=2012-01-19|title=EBV-associated T/NK-cell lymphoproliferative diseases in nonimmunocompromised hosts: prospective analysis of 108 cases|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22096243|journal=Blood|volume=119|issue=3|pages=673–686|doi=10.1182/blood-2011-10-381921|issn=1528-0020|pmid=22096243}}</ref>
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P, T
|D
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Yes (WHO, NCCN)
|The WHO 5<sup>th</sup> edition notes that, "cases with monomorphic and monoclonal proliferation have a poorer outcome than those with polymorphic and polyclonal proliferation."<ref>{{Cite journal|title=BlueBooksOnline|url=https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chapters/63}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Ohshima|first=Koichi|last2=Kimura|first2=Hiroshi|last3=Yoshino|first3=Tadashi|last4=Kim|first4=Chul Woo|last5=Ko|first5=Young H.|last6=Lee|first6=Seung-Suk|last7=Peh|first7=Suat-Cheng|last8=Chan|first8=John K. C.|last9=CAEBV Study Group|date=2008-04|title=Proposed categorization of pathological states of EBV-associated T/natural killer-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) in children and young adults: overlap with chronic active EBV infection and infantile fulminant EBV T-LPD|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18324913|journal=Pathology International|volume=58|issue=4|pages=209–217|doi=10.1111/j.1440-1827.2008.02213.x|issn=1440-1827|pmid=18324913}}</ref>
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
|N/A
The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference). BCR::ABL1 is generally favorable in CML (add reference).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''CIC''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''CIC::DUX4''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Typically, the last exon of ''CIC'' is fused to ''DUX4''. The fusion breakpoint in ''CIC'' is usually intra-exonic and removes an inhibitory sequence, upregulating ''PEA3'' genes downstream of ''CIC'' including ''ETV1'', ''ETV4'', and ''ETV5''.
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> t(4;19)(q25;q13)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Common (CIC-rearranged sarcoma)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
 
''DUX4'' has many homologous genes; an alternate translocation in a minority of cases is t(10;19), but this is usually indistinguishable from t(4;19) by short-read sequencing (add references).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''ALK''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''ELM4::ALK''
 
 
Other fusion partners include ''KIF5B, NPM1, STRN, TFG, TPM3, CLTC, KLC1''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Fusions result in constitutive activation of the ''ALK'' tyrosine kinase. The most common ''ALK'' fusion is ''EML4::ALK'', with breakpoints in intron 19 of ''ALK''. At the transcript level, a variable (5’) partner gene is fused to 3’ ''ALK'' at exon 20. Rarely, ''ALK'' fusions contain exon 19 due to breakpoints in intron 18.
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> N/A
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Rare (Lung adenocarcinoma)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> T
|
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span>
 
Both balanced and unbalanced forms are observed by FISH (add references).
|-
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> ''ABL1''
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> N/A
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Intragenic deletion of exons 2–7 in ''EGFR'' removes the ligand-binding domain, resulting in a constitutively active tyrosine kinase with downstream activation of multiple oncogenic pathways.
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> N/A
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> Recurrent (IDH-wildtype Glioblastoma)
|<span class="blue-text">EXAMPLE:</span> D, P, T
|
|
|-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
|}
==Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH==
==Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH==